The Elements of Qualitative Chemical Analysis, vol. 1, parts 1 and 2.: With Special Consideration of the Application of the Laws of Equilibrium and of the Modern Theories of Solution.Stieglitz, Julius
Science
The Elements of Qualitative Chemical Analysis, vol. 1, parts 1 and 2.: With Special Consideration of the Application of the Laws of Equilibrium and of the Modern Theories of Solution.
Stieglitz, Julius
Chemistry, Analytic -- Qualitative
Besides the complications mentioned, and provided against in the
way discussed, there is still one more complication in the use
of hydrogen sulphide: this is in the matter of the precipitation
of ‹arsenic› sulphide from solutions containing ‹arsenic in the
pentavalent condition›. Since the interpretation of this complication
and the explanation of the methods for avoiding the errors, which
may arise therefrom, are necessarily intimately connected with the
chemical behavior of arsenic acid, this subject will be considered in
the discussion of the arsenic group (Chapter XIII).
FOOTNOTES:
[395] Auerbach, ‹Z. phys. Chem.›, «49», 220 (1904).
[396] See footnote 1, p. 201.
[397] Knox (in Abegg's laboratory), ‹Trans. Faraday Soc.›, «4», 44
(1908).
[398] The concentration of the hydrogen-ion is really a little
greater than that of the hydrosulphide-ion, as a result of the
ionization of the latter, but the amount of hydrogen-ion formed in
this way (about 1E−15) is so minute, compared with that formed by
the primary ionization, that it is negligible.
[399] We can obtain the relation, directly, from H_{2}S ⇄ 2 H^{+} +
S^{2−} and [H^{+}]^2 × [S^{2−}] / [H_{2}S] = K = 1.1E−22. For
a given pressure of the hydrogen sulphide, [H_{2}S], expressing
its solubility (about 0.1 molar at 25°), is constant, and
therefore [H^{+}]^2 × [S^{2−}] = a constant, as given in equation
(IV). Putting [H_{2}S] = 0.1, we have [H^{+}]^2 × [S^{2−}] =
0.1 × 1.1E−22 = 1.1E−23.
[400] On account of the great mass of water, we compare (see
equation, p. 176) [H^{+}] × [HO^{−}] = 1.2E−14 (at 25°) with
[H^{+}] × [S^{2−}] / [HS^{−}] = 1.2E−15.
[401] The calculation was made by the method used by Knox (‹loc.
cit.›) for a molar solution. The degree of ionization of the
salt was not considered and the correct ionization constant for
ammonium hydroxide was used, 1.8E−5 in place of 2.3E−5. The
latter, evidently, was used by Knox as the result of overlooking a
correction, which Bredig made in his (Bredig's) first calculations
of the constant; ‹cf.› Bredig, ‹Z. phys. Chem.›, «13», 293,
footnote. The same erroneous constant is found in Kohlrausch and
Holborn, ‹loc. cit.›, p. 194.
[402] For further values and for the method of calculation, see
Knox, ‹loc. cit.›
[403] [S_{2−}] = 1.1E−23 / [H^{+}]^2, according to equation (IV),
p. 201.
[404] Knox's work leads to that conclusion.
[405] The precipitation of sulphides, from a solution containing
much more of the hydrosulphide-ion than of the sulphide-ion, is
comparable with the precipitation of mercuric oxide, HgO, and of
silver oxide, Ag_{2}O, by sodium or potassium hydroxide.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account