The Elements of Qualitative Chemical Analysis, vol. 1, parts 1 and 2.: With Special Consideration of the Application of the Laws of Equilibrium and of the Modern Theories of Solution.Stieglitz, Julius
Science
The Elements of Qualitative Chemical Analysis, vol. 1, parts 1 and 2.: With Special Consideration of the Application of the Laws of Equilibrium and of the Modern Theories of Solution.
Stieglitz, Julius
Chemistry, Analytic -- Qualitative
By developing the quantitative relations between osmotic forces
and the electrical potential, Nernst[3] was able to show that, at
room temperature[529] (17°–18°), the following logarithmic relation
[p261] holds for the ‹potential difference› between a ‹metal›[530]
and a solution of its ‹ion›, which bathes it:
ε_{Me, Me-salt} = (0.0575 / ‹v›) log(C / K).
In this equation ε_{Me, Me-salt} is the electrical potential, in
volts, existing between the metal Me and the solution of its salt,
Me-salt; ‹v› is the number of electrical charges transferred from
the metal to its ion, and ‹vice versa›, in the action Me ⇄ Me_{ion};
in the present case, it is identical with the ‹valence› of the
metal ion, which the metal forms. C is the concentration of this
ion in any given case, and K is the concentration represented by
the solution-tension constant, ‹i.e.› by the equilibrium constant.
The logarithm is the common one. In place of the concentrations,
K and C, the corresponding ‹osmotic pressures› of the metal ion
(P and ‹p›, as used by Nernst) may be used in the equation, and
for solutions in which osmotic pressure and concentration are not
strictly proportional, the osmotic pressure should be used by
preference (see footnote 4, p. 258). The ‹sign›[531] given to [p262]
ε_{Me, Me-salt}, in any given case, shows the ‹sign› of the ‹electric
charge› on the «first component named in the subscript», which is the
‹metal›, in the present instance.
For the relation between copper and cupric-ion we would have:
ε_{Cu, Cu-salt} = (0.0575/2) log(C / K).
When the concentration of cupric-ion is equal to the constant, C = K,
the logarithm has the value 0 and the potential difference is 0. When
the concentration of cupric-ion is smaller than the constant, C < K,
the potential ε_{Cu, Cu-salt} is ‹negative›, ‹i.e.› the ‹metal›
receives a negative charge. This ‹negative› charge is the greater,
the smaller C is. When C > K, ε_{Cu, Cu-salt} is positive, the copper
plate receives a positive charge, and this ‹positive› charge is the
greater, the larger the value of C is.
«Applications.»—It should be clear, from these considerations, ‹that
an electric current will result, if copper plates are introduced into
solutions containing different concentrations of cupric-ion› and the
solutions and electrodes are connected in such a way as to allow the
flow of a current. If we call Cu′ the copper plate dipping into a
solution containing cupric-ion at a concentration C′, and Cu″ the
plate in a solution containing [Cu^{2+}] = C″, we have[532]: [p263]
ε_{Cu′, Cu″} = ε_{Cu′, CuX} − ε_{Cu″, CuX} =
(0.0575 / 2) [log(C′ / K) − log(C″ / K)]
and[533]
ε_{Cu′, Cu″} = (0.0575 / 2) log(C′ / C″).
It is also clear, from this equation, that the greater the difference
in concentration of the cupric-ion in the two solutions, the greater
should be the potential difference produced. The following series of
experiments illustrates these relations and confirms the conclusions
reached. [p264]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account