"No, you wouldn’t. Lot of it subconscious—suppressed desire, Freud, and
all that. But start him talking, and it’s ’God! I’d have shot that
fellow if I’d had a gun!’ or it’s, ’If I’d had a dose of poison, they’d
never have got me alive.’ Mind ran on it. Yes, sir! Always thinking of
doing somebody in—if not another fellow, then himself."
"I don’t think he knew it."
"Of course he didn’t know it. Seemed natural to him. Our own vices
always do seem natural to us. If you put it up to him now, he’d say he’d
never had a thought of shooting up anyone, and he wouldn’t be lying out
of it, either. Way it seems to him. Way it seems to every criminal of
the class. But to judges and juries it’s just so much ’bull,’ and tells
against the accused in the end. Sure you won’t have a cigar?"
Having again declined the cigar, Bob argued in favor of Teddy, but
Stenhouse was fixed in his convictions.
"I’ll do what I can for him, of course; only, I’m blocked by his refusal
to plead guilty. Pleading guilty might—I don’t say it would, but it
might—incline the judge to mercy. It would get him off, too, with the
second degree, only that, when his own story shows him as guilty as
hell, he keeps pulling the innocent stuff to beat a jazz band. The
rascal who plumps with his confession will always get the clemency,
while the fellow with a mouthful of innocence will be sent to the
chair."
"But if he does feel that he’s innocent—"
"Sure he feels that he’s innocent! That’s it! That’s what I’m talking
about—the ingrained criminal’s lack of consciousness that his kind of
crime is crime. The other fellow’s—yes; but his—why, the law is a fool
to be made that way and trip a good fellow up! To hear this young shaver
talk, you’d think the courts should be manned by pickpockets."
"All the same, he was in a tight place—"
"What’s that got to do with it? If we didn’t get into tight places,
there’d be no need for laws of any kind."
"I was only thinking of his motive—"
"His motive may have been all right. I’ll not dispute you there, because
you’ll find that legally there’s a difference between motive and intent.
His motive may have been to provide for his mother, just as he says.
Good! No harm in that whatever. But his intent was to rob a bank and
shoot the guy that came out after him. The court won’t go into his
motives. It’ll deal only with his intent, and with what came of it."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account