The English and Scottish popular ballads, volume 4 (of 5)
General
The English and Scottish popular ballads, volume 4 (of 5)
Ballads, English -- England -- Texts; Ballads, Scots -- Scotland -- Texts
No copy of this ballad earlier than the last century is known to me. The
Museum Catalogue gives a conjectural date of 1740 to #a# and of 1720 to
#b#, and, conjecturally again, assigns both to Newcastle. #c#, #d#, #e#
are also without date. #c# may be as old as #b#; #d#, #e# are at least
not old, and #f# is of this century. The ballad was given under the
title ‘Græme and Bewick,’ in Scott’s Minstrelsy, 1803, III, 93, “from
the recitation of a gentleman” who remembered it but imperfectly. In a
succeeding edition, III, 66, 1833, deficiencies were partly supplied and
some different readings adopted “from a copy obtained by the recitation
of an ostler in Carlisle.” The first copy (entitled ‘Chirstie Græme’)
was sent Scott by William Laidlaw, January 3, 1803 (Letters, vol. i, No
78), as taken down by him from the singing of Mr Walter Grieve, in
Craik, on Borthwick Water. It is preserved in “Scotch Ballads, Materials
for Border Minstrelsy,” No 89, Abbotsford (#h#); and in the same volume,
No 145, is what is shown by internal evidence to be the ostler’s copy
(#g#). Both copies were indisputably derived from print, though #h# may
have passed through several mouths. #g# agrees with #b-f# closely as to
minute points of phraseology which it is difficult to believe that a
reciter would have retained. It looks more like an immediate, though
faulty, transcript from print. Of many deviations, though most may be
charge-able to a bad copyist, or, if one pleases, a bad memory, others
indicate an original which differed in some particulars from #b-f#; and
the same may perhaps be true of #h#, which is, however, of only very
trifling value.[92]
‘The Brothers-in-Arms,’ Maidment, Scotish Ballads and Songs, 1868, II,
150, is Scott’s later copy.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account