The English and Scottish popular ballads, volume 5 (of 5)
General
The English and Scottish popular ballads, volume 5 (of 5)
Ballads, English -- England -- Texts; Ballads, Scots -- Scotland -- Texts
=A a=, =b=, =c= (disregarding Scott’s interpolations in =b=), do
not differ more than transcripts of one original may be expected to
do, remembering that copyists are apt to indulge in trivial verbal
improvements.[103] =a= was sent David Herd, with a letter dated January
12, 1795, by Andrew Plummer, Sheriff-Depute of Selkirk, as received by
carrier from a lady, who neglected to impart how she came by the copy.
In this instance, contrary to what I believe to be the general rule,
the second volume of Herd’s MSS seems to have the original text.[104]
=a= was printed, but not with absolute fidelity, by Maidment, Scotish
Ballads and Songs, 1868, II, 66. For =b=, “the copy principally
resorted to,” says Scott, “is one, apparently of considerable
antiquity, which was found among the papers of the late Mrs Cockburn
of Edinburgh.” Scott made occasional use of Herd’s MS. and of
Glenriddell’s, inserted some stanzas which he had received from Sheriff
Plummer, and in the second edition (otherwise slightly altered) two
stanzas from the recitation of Mungo Park. Mrs Cockburn’s MS. evidently
agreed very nearly with the copy in Herd, so far as the latter goes.
I much regret that exertions made to secure the Cockburn MS. did
not result successfully. =c.= “From a note appended to the ballad,
explanatory of its circumstances, in which reference is made to Lord
Philiphaugh (a judge of Session) as being then alive,” says Aytoun,
“the manuscript must have been written between the years 1689 and
1702.”[105] The original manuscript, unfortunately and inexplicably, is
no longer in the Philiphaugh archives, and has not come to light after
search. The text, if earlier transcribed, shows no internal evidence
of superior age, and exhibits several inferior readings,--two that are
highly objectionable.[106] =d=, the copy actually preserved among the
Philiphaugh papers, is evinced by a watermark to be not older than
1848. It shows variations from Aytoun’s printed text which cannot be
other than wilful alterations.
=B=, which is both defective, corrupted, and chargeable with flat
repetition, and =C=, a few fragmentary verses, are all that have been
retrieved from tradition, although Scott says that the ballad “has been
for ages a popular song in Selkirkshire.”
A manuscript copy was understood to be in possession of the late Mr
George Wilson, S. S. C., Edinburgh, but, as in the case of the original
of the Philiphaugh MS. and in that of Mrs Cockburn’s copy, inquiry and
search were fruitless.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account