Wood himself certainly did nothing to divert architectural design from
its accustomed channel. He, and his son after him, stamped Bath with
its particular character, and made it the finest city in England.
It had become a fashionable resort early in the eighteenth century,
largely owing to the exertions of Beau Nash, and it is a fortunate
circumstance that when it had to expand there was so accomplished a
man as John Wood on the spot to control the expansion. He it was who
first designed streets and squares and rows of houses as definite
architectural conceptions. There is much to be said for this idea,
especially when the work is new and the design still retains the colour
and disposition intended by the architect, and while the buildings are
occupied for the purposes for which they were built. But with the lapse
of time inevitable changes occur. The property falls into different
hands; each owner treats his portion after his own will. It may be that
one paints his part of the façade one colour, while another paints his
of a different tint, the lines of demarcation having no relation to
the architectural treatment. Some of the tenements may become business
premises, with large indications of their purpose exposed to catch
the public eye. Others may even be rebuilt in a fashion wholly out of
keeping with the original design. In short, although a square may be
built as one architectural conception, it is impossible to preserve it
as such in perpetuity, and when once the original idea is destroyed
by the march of events, the effect is worse than if it had never been
conceived.
[Illustration: FIG. 184.--Pulteney Bridge, Bath.
From an Aquatint by Thomas Malton.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account