In the Smithson collection there is an interesting drawing which shows
a plan of the old Banqueting House previous to its destruction, and an
elevation of the ground story of the new Banqueting House (Fig. 38).
They are obviously not drawn to the same scale, inasmuch as the new
building was 100 ft. long as against 120 ft. for the old. The fact
that Smithson thought it worth while to draw the ground story, so far
as then built, suggests that he was struck by its novel treatment.
The rusticated stonework, the flat arched openings, and the unmoulded
plinth and stringcourse were unfamiliar features.
[Illustration: FIG. 37.--Drawing by Inigo Jones for the
Banqueting House, Whitehall. A preliminary sketch, subsequently
modified. The annexes were omitted.
From the Chatsworth Collection.]
[Illustration:
FIG. 38.--Plan of the Old Banqueting House which was
burnt down. Below is an Elevation of “The First Storye of the
Newe Banketinge house.”
From the Smithson Collection.]
There is so far nothing to connect Jones with the designs for the
palace, as distinguished from the Banqueting House, except the
assumption of Kent and Campbell. An examination of the various
drawings serves further to dissociate him from them. At Worcester
College are the finished drawings for the scheme published by Kent: but
in addition to those which he used are others which have not hitherto
been elucidated; some of them are, in fact, the elevations and sections
of a different scheme, while one is the isolated plan of a third. The
key to this part of the puzzle lies at Chatsworth in the shape of
the collection of drawings and sketches, bound together and entitled
“Designs for Whitehall.” These turn out to be almost entirely the work
of Webb, among them being, however, the drawings of the Banqueting
House by Jones himself. The drawings by Webb are the preliminary
sketches for the finished set at Worcester College, as well as some
for yet other schemes, and among them are the elevations, as well as
a plan, corresponding to the isolated plan at Worcester College. The
writing and the drawing, the thumb-nail sketches, the alterations,
variations, and corrections all go to show that here we have the
inception of several schemes, all by Webb, the ultimate outcome of
which was the well-known design published some eighty years afterwards
by Kent.
There are, in fact, not two, but at least seven different schemes for
the palace, more or less worked out. Of these two are by Webb, and are
preliminary to the third, which was published by Kent; a fourth is a
variant of the third; the fifth and sixth are undoubtedly by Webb; the
seventh is the British Museum design published by Campbell.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account