_Of Gender._--In Anglo-Saxon there are three genders, the masculine, the
feminine, and the neuter. With _adjectives_ each gender has its peculiar
declension; with _substantives_ there are also appropriate terminations,
but only to a certain degree; _e.g._, of words ending in _-a_ (_nama_, a
name; _cuma_, a guest), it may be stated that they are always masculine; of
words in _-u_ (_sunu_, a son; _gifu_, a gift), that they are never neuter;
in other words, that they are either mas. or fem.
The definite article varies with the gender of its substantive; _thaet
eage_, the eye; _se steorra_, the star; _seo tunge_, the tongue. {114}
_Of Number._--The plural form in _-en_ (as in _oxen_), rare in English, was
common in Anglo-Saxon. It was the regular termination of a whole
declension; _e.g._, _e['a]gan_, eyes; _steorran_, stars; _tungan_, tongues.
Besides this, the Anglo-Saxons had forms in _-u_ and _-a_, as _ricu_,
kingdoms; _gifa_, gifts. The termination _-s_, current in the present
English was confined to a single gender and to a single declension, as
_endas_, ends; _dagas_, days; _smidhas_, smiths.
_Of Case._--Of these the Saxons had, for their substantives, at least
three; viz. the nominative, dative, genitive. With the pronouns and
adjectives there was a true accusative form; and with a few especial words
an ablative or instrumental one. _Smidh_, a smith; _smidhe_, to a smith;
_smidhes_, of a smith. Plural, _smidhas_, smiths; _smidhum_, to smiths;
_smidha_, of smiths: _he_, he; _hine_, him; _him_, to him; _his_, his;
_se_, the; _tha_, the; _thy_, with the; _tham_, to the; _thaes_, of the.
Of the dative in _-um_, the word _whilom_ (_at times_, _at whiles_) is a
still extant and an almost isolated specimen.
_Of Declension._--In _Anglo-Saxon_ it is necessary to determine the
termination of a substantive. There is the weak, or simple declension for
words ending in a vowel (as _eage_, _steorra_, _tunga_), and the strong, or
complex declension for words ending in a consonant (_smidh_, _spraec_,
_le['a]f_). The letters _i_ and _u_ are dealt with as semivowels,
semivowels being dealt with as consonants; so that words like _sunu_ and
_gifu_ belong to the same declension as _smidh_ and _spr['ae]c_.
That the form of adjectives varies with their definitude or indefinitude,
has been seen from s. 93: definite adjectives following the inflection of
the simple; indefinite ones that of the complex declension.
The detail of the Anglo-Saxon declension may be collected from ss. 83-89.
The Anglo-Saxon inflection of the participles present is remarkable. With
the exception of the form for the genitive plural definite (which, instead
of _-ena_, is _-ra_,) they follow the declension of the adjectives. From
the masculine substantives formed from them, and denoting the agent, they
may be distinguished by a difference of inflection. {115}
_Participle._ _Substantive._
Wegferende=_Wayfaring_. Wegferend=_Wayfarer_.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account