"Besides the increase of loudness, and the sharper tone which
distinguishes the accented syllable, there is also a tendency to dwell
upon it, or, in other words, to lengthen its quantity. We cannot
increase the loudness or the sharpness of a tone without a certain
degree of muscular action: and to put the muscles in motion requires
time. It would seem that the time required for producing a perceptible
increase in the loudness or sharpness of a tone is greater than that of
pronouncing some of our shorter syllables. If we attempt, for instance,
to throw the accent on the first syllable of the word _become_, we must
either lengthen the vowel, and pronounce the word _bee-come_, _or add
the adjoining consonant to the first syllable, and so pronounce the
word_ _bec-ome_. We often find it convenient to lengthen the quantity
even of the longer syllables, when we wish to give them a very strong
and marked accent. Hence, no doubt, arose the vulgar notion, that
accent always lengthens the quantity of a syllable.
"It is astonishing how widely this notion has misled men, whose
judgment, in most other matters of criticism, it would be very unsafe
to question. Our earlier writers, almost to a man, confound accent with
quantity."--B. i. C. iv.
* * * * *
{172}
CHAPTER VIII.
THE PRINCIPLES OF ORTHOEPY.
s. 240. The present chapter is one, not upon the details of the
pronunciation of the English language, but upon the principles of orthoepy.
For the details of pronunciation the reader is referred to Nares' Orthoepy,
and to the common pronouncing dictionaries, with the preliminary
recommendation to use them with caution. _Orthoepy_, a word derived from
the Greek _orthon_ (_upright_), and _epos_ (_a word_), signifies the right
utterance of words. Orthoepy differs from orthography by determining how
words are spoken, whereas orthography decides how they are spelt. The one
is a question of speech, the other a question of spelling. Orthography
presupposes orthoepy.
s. 241. Of pronunciation there are two kinds, the colloquial and the
rhetorical. In common conversation we pronounce the _i_ in _wind_, like the
_i_ in _bit_; in rehearsing, or in declamation, however, we pronounce it
like the _i_ in _bite_; that is, we give it a diphthongal sound. In reading
the Scriptures we say _bless['e]d_; in current speech we say _blest_. It is
the same with many words occurring in poetry.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account