The usual declension of the personal pronouns is exceptionable. _I_ and
_me_, _thou_ and _ye_, stand in no etymological relations to each other.
The true view of the words is, that they are not irregular but defective.
_I_ has no _oblique_, and _me_ no nominative case. And so with respect to
the rest.
_I_, in German _ich_, Icelandic _ek_, corresponds with [Greek: ego], and
_ego_ of the classical languages; _ego_ and [Greek: ego] being, like _I_,
defective in the oblique cases.
_My_, as stated above, is a form originally accusative, but now used in a
genitive sense.
_Me._--In Anglo-Saxon this was called a dative form. The fact seems to be
that both _my_ and _me_ grow out of an accusative form, _meh_, _mec_.
That the sound of _k_ originally belonged to the pronouns _me_ and _thee_,
we learn not only from the Anglo-Saxons _mec_, _thec_, _meh_, _theh_, but
from the Icelandic _mik_, _thik_, and the German _mich_, _dich_. This
accounts for the form _my_; since _y_=_ey_, and the sounds of _y_ and _g_
are allied. That both _me_ and _my_ can be evolved from _mik_, we see in
the present Scandinavian languages, where, very often even in the same
district, _mig_ is pronounced both _mey_ and _mee_. {244}
_We_ and _our_.--These words are not in the condition of _I_ and _me_.
Although the fact be obscured, they are really in an etymological relation
to each other. This we infer from the alliance between the sounds of _w_
and _ou_, and from the Danish forms _vi_ (_we_), _vor_ (_our_). It may be
doubted, however, whether _our_ be a true genitive rather than an
adjectival form. In the form _ours_ we find it playing the part, not of a
case, but of an independent word. Upon this, however, too much stress
cannot be laid. In Danish it takes a neuter form: _vor_=_noster_;
_vort_=_nostrum_. From this I conceive that it agrees, not with the Latin
genitive _nostr[^u]m_, but with the adjective _noster_.
_Us, we, our._--Even _us_ is in an etymological relation to _we_. That _we_
and _our_ are so, has just been shown. Now in Anglo-Saxon there were two
forms of _our_, _viz_., _['u]re_ (=_nostr[^u]m_), and _user_ (=_noster_).
This connects _we_ and _us_ through _our_.
From these preliminary notices we have the changes in form of the true
personal pronouns, as follows:--
1ST PERSON
_1st Term._ (_for nominative singular_).
_I._ Undeclined.
_2nd Term._ (_for the singular number_).
Acc. _Me_. Gen. _My_. Form in _n_--_Mine_.
_3rd Term._ (_for the plural number_).
Nom. _We_. Acc. _Us_. Form in _r_--_Our_, _ours_.
2ND PERSON.
_1st Term._ (_for the singular number_).
Nom. _Thou_. Acc. _Thee_. Gen. _Thy_. Form in _n_--_Thine_.
_2nd Term._ (_for the plural number_).
Nom. _Ye_. Acc. _You_. Form in _r_--_Your_, _yours_.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account