_Each._--The particle _gi_ enters, like the particle in the composition of
pronouns. Old High German, _[^e]ogal[^i]her_, every one; _[^e]ocalih_, all;
Middle High German, _iegelich_; New High German, _jeglich_; Anglo-Saxon,
_aelc_; English, _each_; the _l_ being dropped, as in _which_ and _such_.
_Aelc_, as the original of the English _each_ and the Scotch _ilka,_[42]
must by no means be confounded with the word _ylce_, _the same_. (Grimm, D.
G. iii. 54.)
_Every_, in Old English, _everich_, _everech_, _everilk one_, is _aelc_,
preceded by the particle _ever_. (Grimm, D. G. iii. 54.)
_Either._--Old High German, _[^e]ogahuedar_; Middle High German,
_iegeweder_; Anglo-Saxon, _aeghvaedher_, _aegdher_; Old Frisian, _eider_.
_Neither._--The same, with the negative article prefixed. _Neither_ :
_either_ :: _naught_ : _aught_.
_Other_, _whether_.--These words, although derived forms, being simpler
than some that have preceded, might fairly {259} have been dealt with
before. They make, however, a transition from the present to the succeeding
chapter, and so find a place here.
A. _First_, it may be stated of them that the idea which they express is
not that _of one out of many_, but that of _one out of two_.
1. In Sanskrit there are two forms, ^a) _kataras_, the same word as
_whether_, meaning _which out of two_; ^b) _katamas_, _which out of many_.
So also _[^e]kateras_, _one out of two_; _[^e]katamas_, _one out of many_.
In Greek, the Ionic form [Greek: koteros] ([Greek: poteros]); in Latin,
_uter_, _neuter_, _alter_; and in Moeso-Gothic, _hvathar_, have the same
form and the same meaning.
2. In the Scandinavian language the word _anden_, Dano-Saxon _annar_,
Iceland corresponds to the English word _second_, and not the German
_zweite:_ e. g., _Karl den Anden_, _Charles the Second_. Now _anthar_ is
the older form of _other_.
B. _Secondly_, it may be stated of them, that the termination _-er_ is the
same termination that we find in the comparative degree.
1. The idea expressed by the comparative degree is the comparison, not of
_many_, but of _two_ things; _this is better than that_.
2. In all the Indo-European languages where there are pronouns in _-ter_,
there is also a comparative degree in _-ter_. See next chapter.
3. As the Sanskrit form _kataras_ corresponds with the comparative degree,
where there is the comparison of _two things with each other_; so the word
_katamas_ is a superlative form; and in the superlative degree lies the
comparison of _many_ things with each other.
Hence _other_ and _whether_ (to which may be added _either_ and _neither_)
are pronouns with the comparative form.
_Other_ has the additional peculiarity of possessing the plural form
_others_. Hence, like _self_, it is, in the strictest sense, a substantival
pronoun.
* * * * *
{260}
CHAPTER IX.
ON CERTAIN FORMS IN -ER.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account