Now let the root _mag-_, as in _magnus_, [Greek: megas], and _mikil_
(Norse), give the idea of greatness. In the Latin language we have from it
two comparative forms: 1. the adjectival comparative _major_=_greater_; 2.
the adverbial comparative _magis_=_more_ (_plus_). The same takes place in
Moeso-Gothic: _maiza_ means _greater_, and is adjectival; _mais_ means
_more_, and is adverbial. The Anglo-Saxon forms are more instructive still;
_e.g._, _thaes the m[^a]_=_all the more_, _thaes the bet_=_all the better_,
have a comparative sense, but not a comparative form, the sign _r_ being
absent. Now, compared with _major_, and subject to the remarks that have
gone before, the Latin _magis_ is the older form. With _m[^a]_ and _bet_,
compared with _more_ and _better_, this may or may not be the case. _M[^a]_
and _bet_ may each be one of two forms; 1. a positive used in a comparative
sense; 2. a true comparative, which has lost {265} its termination. The
present section has been written not for the sake of exhausting the
subject, but to show that in the comparative degree there were often two
forms; of which one, the adverbial, was either more antiquated, or more
imperfect than the other: a fact bearing upon some of the forthcoming
trains of etymological reasoning.
s. 314. _Change of vowel._--By reference to Rask's Grammar, s. 128, it may
be seen that in the Anglo-Saxon there were, for the comparative and
superlative degrees, two forms; _viz._ _-or_ and _-re_, and _-ost_ and
_-este_, respectively.
By reference to p. 159 of the present volume, it may be seen that the
fulness or smallness of a vowel in a given syllable may work a change in
the nature of the vowel in a syllable adjoining. In the Anglo-Saxon the
following words exhibit a change of vowel.
_Positive._ _Comparative._ _Superlative._
Lang, Lengre, Lengest. _Long._
Strang, Strengre, Strengest. _Strong._
Geong, Gyngre, Gyngest. _Young._
Sceort, Scyrtre, Scyrtest. _Short._
He['a]h, Hyrre, Hyhst. _High._
Eald, Yldre, Yldest. _Old._
Of this change, the word last quoted is a still-existing specimen, as
_old_, _elder_ and _older_, _eldest_ and _oldest_. Between the two forms
there is a difference in meaning, _elder_ being used as a substantive, and
having a plural form, _elders_.
s. 315. The previous section has stated that in Anglo-Saxon there were two
forms for the comparative and superlative degrees, one in _-re_ and
_-este_, the other in _-or_ and _-ost_, respectively. Now the first of
these was the form taken by adjectives; as _se scearpre sweord_=_the
sharper sword_, and _se scearpeste sweord_=_the sharpest sword_. The
second, on the other hand, was the form taken by adverbs; as, _se sweord
scyrdh scearpor_=_the sword cuts sharper_, and _se sweord scyrdh
scearpost_=_the sword cuts sharpest_.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account