The English Prison SystemRuggles-Brise, Evelyn, Sir
History
The English Prison System
Ruggles-Brise, Evelyn, Sir
Prisons -- Great Britain
As to (2) it has since been made a charge against the administration
of these days that it erred on the side of a too severe repression. To
those who have lost their faith in the virtues of the cellular system,
it may seem unduly rigorous that a prisoner should have remained
subject to that system during the whole length of his sentence.
There were, of course, exceptions to the general rule, _e.g._,
persons employed in the service of the prison, and other forms of
extra-cellular labour, but separate confinement remained the rule for
Local Prisons. To those, also, who condemn all forms of mechanical and
unproductive labour, it may seem unduly rigorous to have insisted so
minutely on the exact performance of a task of so-called first class
hard labour. It is doubtful if public sentiment at that time would
have been satisfied with the comparative leniency of the modern prison
régime. The result of the earnest thought and discussion which have
taken place through the civilized world during the last quarter of a
century on all matters affecting the welfare of the prisoner has been,
no doubt, to place his punishment on a more rational basis than that
of mere obedience to mechanical and uninteresting forms of labour. The
State until now had had no experience in dealing with short sentences.
The problem to be solved was a new one, _viz_:--how to deal effectively
with a man who was in prison for only a few days or weeks, and to
whom during that time no useful trade could be taught. It is indeed
a problem which may well vex the brains of the wisest, and if the
solution has not yet been found, we have at least got beyond the stage
where it was thought sufficient, by the invention of fantastic devices
for executing sentences of so-called hard labour, to give expression to
a sentence of imprisonment. The Prison Authority of this day perhaps
erred in regarding it as a part of their duty to add to the penalty
prescribed by the Court by imposing, in the name of the Progressive
Stage System, certain penalties and incapacities as a peculiar feature
of the early Stages. The only precedent for dealing with short
sentences was that afforded by Military Prisons. It is well-known that
the Committee on Military Prisons of 1844, which was in favour of hard
penal treatment--shot-drill, cranks, &c., (in use in military prisons
as a punishment for recalcitrant soldiers) exercised a considerable
influence with local authorities in administering Civil Prisons, and
the reproach, so often directed to the Local Prison System, that it was
too military in its character, was probably due to this source.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account