The English Village Community: Examined in its Relations to the Manorial and Tribal Systems and to the Common or Open Field System of Husbandry; An Essay in Economic History (Reprinted from the Fourth Edition)Seebohm, Frederic
History
The English Village Community: Examined in its Relations to the Manorial and Tribal Systems and to the Common or Open Field System of Husbandry; An Essay in Economic History (Reprinted from the Fourth Edition)
Seebohm, Frederic
Village communities -- Great Britain
We have seen that not only the general description of serfdom
contained in the '_Rectitudines_,' but also the two examples we have
been able to examine of serfdom upon particular manors in Saxon
times, testify clearly to the existence of a serfdom upon Saxon
manors as complete and onerous as the later serfdom upon Norman
manors. And we have seen that, connecting this evidence with that of
the laws of King Ine, the proof is clear of the existence of manors
and serfdom in the seventh century, _i.e._ 400 years before the
Norman Conquest. There remains to be quoted the still earlier though
scanty evidence of the laws of King Ethelbert, A.D. 597–616; which,
if genuine, bring us back to the date of the mission of St. Augustine
to England.
«in single ownership.»
The evidence of these laws is accidental and indirect, but taken in
connexion with that already considered, it seems to show conclusively
that the 'hams' and 'tuns' of that early period were already manors.
Upon one point at least it is clear. It goes so far as to indicate
that they were in the ownership of individuals, and not of free
village communities.
The following passages occur:-- [p174]
III. Gif cyning æt mannes ham drincæð, &c.
V. Gif in cyninges túne man mannan ofslea, &c.
XIII. Gif on eorles túne man mannan ofslæhð, &c.
XVII. Gif man in mannes tun ærest geirneð, &c.
3. If the king drink at a man's _ham_, &c.
5. If in the king's _tun_ a man slay another, &c.
13. If in an earl's _tun_ a man slay another, &c.
17. If a man into a man's _tun_ enter, &c.
If there be any doubt as to the manorial character of these 'hams'
and 'tuns,' it lies not in the point of the single ownership of them,
but in other points, whether they were worked and tilled by the
owners' slaves, or by a village community in serfdom.
The only classes of tenants which are mentioned in the laws of King
Ethelbert are the three grades of _læts_ referred to in the following
passage:
XXVI. Gif [man] læt ofslæhð þone selestan. lxxx. scill.
forgelde. Gif þane oðerne ofslæhð. lx. scillingum forgelde.
þane þriddan. xl. scillingum forgelden.
26. If [a man] slay a _læt_ of the best [class], let him pay
lxxx. shillings: if he slay one of the second, let him pay lx.
shillings: of the third, let him pay xl. shillings.
«with _semi_-servile tenants or 'læts.'»
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account