The English works of Thomas Hobbes of Malmesbury, Volume 01 (of 11)Hobbes, Thomas
Philosophy
The English works of Thomas Hobbes of Malmesbury, Volume 01 (of 11)
Hobbes, Thomas
Philosophy, English -- 17th century
Let the side A B of the parallelogram A B D C, (in the 11th figure) be
understood to be moved with uniform motion till it be coincident with C
D; and let the time of that motion be A C or B D. Also in the same time
let the side A C be understood to be moved with motion uniformly
accelerated, till it be coincident with B D; then dividing A B in the
middle in E, let A F be made a mean proportional between A B and A E;
and drawing F G parallel to A C, let the side A C be understood to be
moved in the same time A C with uniform motion till it be coincident
with F G. I say, the whole A B confers as much to the velocity of the
body placed in A, when the motion of A C is uniformly accelerated till
it comes to B D, as the part A F confers to the same, when the side A C
is moved uniformly and in the same time to F G.
For seeing A F is a mean proportional between the whole A B and its half
A E, B D will (by the 13th article) be the last impetus acquired by A C,
with motion uniformly accelerated till it come to the same B D; and
consequently, the strait line F B will be the excess, by which the
length, transmitted by A C with motion uniformly accelerated, will
exceed the length transmitted by the same A C in the same time with
uniform motion, and with impetus every where equal to B D. Wherefore, if
the whole A B be moved uniformly to C D in the same time in which A C is
moved uniformly to F G, the part F B, seeing it concurs not at all with
the motion of the side A C which is supposed to be moved only to F G,
will confer nothing to its motion. Again, supposing the side A C to be
moved to B D with motion uniformly accelerated, the side A B with its
uniform motion to C D will less put forwards the body when it is
accelerated in all the parallels, than when it is not at all
accelerated; and by how much the greater the acceleration is, by so much
the less it will put it forwards, as is shown in the 12th article. When
therefore A C is in F G with accelerated motion, the body will not be in
the side C D at the point G, but at the point D; so that G D will be the
excess, by which the length transmitted with accelerated motion to B D
exceeds the length transmitted with uniform motion to F G; so that the
body by its acceleration avoids the action of the part A F, and comes to
the side C D in the time A C, and makes the length C D, which is equal
to the length A B. Wherefore uniform motion from A B to C D in the time
A C, works no more in the whole length A B upon the body uniformly
accelerated from A C to B D, than if A C were moved in the same time
with uniform motion to F G; the difference consisting only in this, that
when A B works upon the body uniformly moved from A C to F G, that, by
which the accelerated motion exceeds the uniform motion, is altogether
in F B or G D; but when the same A B works upon the body accelerated,
that, by which the accelerated motion exceeds the uniform motion, is
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account