The English works of Thomas Hobbes of Malmesbury, Volume 01 (of 11)Hobbes, Thomas
Philosophy
The English works of Thomas Hobbes of Malmesbury, Volume 01 (of 11)
Hobbes, Thomas
Philosophy, English -- 17th century
For (by art. 2, chapter XV.) the proportion of the complement B E F C D
to the deficient figure A B E F C is all the proportions of D B to B A,
O E to E G, Q F to F H, and of all the lines parallel to D B terminated
in the line B E F C, to all the parallels to A B terminated in the same
points of the line B E F C. And seeing the proportions of D B to O E,
and of D B to Q F &c. are everywhere triplicate of the proportions of A
B to G E, and of A B to H F &c. the proportions of H F to A B, and of G
E to A B &c. (by art. 16, chap. XIII.), are triplicate of the
proportions of Q F to D B, and of O E to D B &c. and therefore the
deficient figure A B E F C, which is the aggregate of all the lines H F,
G E, A B, &c. is triple to the complement B E F C D made of all the
lines Q F, O E, D B, &c.; which was to be proved.
It follows from hence, that the same complement B E F C D is 1⁄4 of the
whole parallelogram. And by the same method may be calculated in all
other deficient figures, generated as above declared, the proportion of
the parallelogram to either of its parts; as that when the parallels
increase from a point in the same proportion, the parallelogram will be
divided into two equal triangles; when one increase is double to the
other, it will be divided into a semiparabola and its complement, or
into 2 and 1.
The same construction standing, the same conclusion may otherwise be
demonstrated thus.
Let the strait line C B be drawn cutting G K in L, and through L let M N
be drawn parallel to the strait line A C; wherefore the parallelograms G
M and L D will be equal. Then let L K be divided into three equal parts,
so that it may be to one of those parts in the same proportion which the
proportion of A C to G C, or of G K to G L, hath to the proportion of G
K to G E. Therefore L K will be to one of those three parts as the
arithmetical proportion between G K and G L is to the arithmetical
proportion between G K and the same G K wanting the third part of L K;
and K E will be somewhat greater than a third of L K. Seeing now the
altitude A G or M L is, by reason of the continual decrease, to be
supposed less than any quantity that can be given; L K, which is
intercepted between the diagonal B C and the side B D, will be also less
than any quantity that can be given; and consequently, if G be put so
near to A in _g_, as that the difference between C _g_ and C A be less
than any quantity that can be assigned, the difference also between C
_l_ (removing L to _l_) and C B, will be less than any quantity that can
be assigned; and the line _g l_ being drawn and produced to the line B D
in _k_, cutting the crooked line in _e_, the proportion of G _k_ to G
_l_ will still be triplicate to the proportion of G _k_ to G _e_, and
the difference between _k_ and _e_, the third part of _k l_, will be
less than any quantity that can be given; and therefore the
parallelogram _e_ D will differ from a third part of the parallelogram A
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account