The English works of Thomas Hobbes of Malmesbury, Volume 01 (of 11)Hobbes, Thomas
Philosophy
The English works of Thomas Hobbes of Malmesbury, Volume 01 (of 11)
Hobbes, Thomas
Philosophy, English -- 17th century
13. There are also other quantities which are determinable from the
knowledge of their causes, namely, from the comparison of the motions by
which they are made; and that more easily than from the common elements
of geometry. For example, that the superficies of any portion of a
sphere is equal to that circle, whose radius is a strait line drawn from
the pole of the portion to the circumference of its base, I may
demonstrate in this manner. Let B A C (in fig. 7) be a portion of a
sphere, whose axis is A E, and whose base is B C; and let A B be the
strait line drawn from the pole A to the base in B; and let A D, equal
to A B, touch the great circle B A C in the pole A. It is to be proved
that the circle made by the radius A D is equal to the superficies of
the portion B A C. Let the plain A E B D be understood to make a
revolution about the axis A E; and it is manifest that by the strait
line A D a circle will be described; and by the arch A B the superficies
of a portion of a sphere; and lastly, by the subtense A B the
superficies of a right cone. Now seeing both the strait line A B and the
arch A B make one and the same revolution, and both of them have the
same extreme points A and B, the cause why the spherical superficies,
which is made by the arch, is greater than the conical superficies,
which is made by the subtense, is, that A B the arch is greater than A B
the subtense; and the cause why it is greater consists in this, that
although they be both drawn from A to B, yet the subtense is drawn
strait, but the arch angularly, namely, according to that angle which
the arch makes with the subtense, which angle is equal to the angle D A
B (for an angle of contingence adds nothing to an angle of a segment, as
has been shown in chapter XIV, article 16.) Wherefore the magnitude of
the angle D A B is the cause why the superficies of the portion,
described by the arch A B, is greater than the superficies of the right
cone described by the subtense A B.
Again, the cause why the circle described by the tangent A D is greater
than the superficies of the right cone described by the subtense A B
(notwithstanding that the tangent and the subtense are equal, and both
moved round in the same time) is this, that A D stands at right angles
to the axis, but A B obliquely; which obliquity consists in the same
angle D A B. Seeing therefore the quantity of the angle D A B is that
which makes the excess both of the superficies of the portion, and of
the circle made by the radius A D, above the superficies of the right
cone described by the subtense A B; it follows, that both the
superficies of the portion and that of the circle do equally exceed the
superficies of the cone. Wherefore the circle made by A D or A B, and
the spherical superficies made by the arch A B, are equal to one
another; which was to be proved.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account