The English works of Thomas Hobbes of Malmesbury, Volume 01 (of 11)Hobbes, Thomas
Philosophy
The English works of Thomas Hobbes of Malmesbury, Volume 01 (of 11)
Hobbes, Thomas
Philosophy, English -- 17th century
For example, let the first figure of three means be taken, whose half is
A B C D (in fig. 6), and let the rectangle A B E D be completed. The
complement therefore will be B C D E. And seeing A B E D is to the
figure A B C D (by the table) as 5 to 4, the same A B E D will be to the
complement B C D E as 5 to 1. Wherefore, if F G be drawn parallel to the
base D A, cutting the axis so that A G be to G B as 4 to 5, the centre
of equiponderation of the figure A B C D will, by the precedent article,
be somewhere in the same F G. Again, seeing, by the same article, the
complete figure A B E D, is to the complement B C D E as 5 to 1,
therefore if B E and A D be divided in I and H as 5 to 1 the centre of
equiponderation of the complement B C D E will be somewhere in the
strait line which connects H and I. Let now the strait line L K be drawn
through M the centre of the complete figure, parallel to the base; and
the strait line N O through the same centre M, perpendicular to it; and
let the strait lines L K and F G cut the strait line H I in P and Q. Let
P R be taken quadruple to P Q; and let R M be drawn and produced to F G
in S. R M therefore will be to M S as 4 to 1, that is, as the figure A B
C D to its complement B C D E. Wherefore, seeing M is the centre of the
complete figure A B E D, and the distances of R and S from the centre M
be in proportion reciprocal to that of the weight of the complement B C
D E to the weight of the figure A B C D, R and S will either be the
centres of equiponderation of their own figures, or those centres will
be in some other points of the diameters of equiponderation H I and F G.
But this last is impossible. For no other strait line can be drawn
through the point M terminating in the strait lines H I and F G, and
retaining the proportion of M R to M S, that is, of the figure A B C D
to its complement B C D E. The centre, therefore, of equiponderation of
the figure A B C D is in the point S. Now, seeing P M hath the same
proportion to Q S which R P hath to R Q, Q S will be 5 of those parts of
which P M is four, that is, of which I N is four. But I N or P M is 2 of
those parts of which E B or F G is 6; and, therefore, if it be as 4 to
5, so 2 to a fourth, that fourth will be 2½. Wherefore Q S is 2½ of
those parts of which F G is 6. But F Q is 1; and, therefore, F S is 3½.
Wherefore the remaining part G S is 2½. So that F G is so divided in S,
that the part towards the axis is in proportion to the other part, as 2½
to 3½, that is as 5 to 7; which answereth to the fraction 5⁄7 in the
second row, next under the fraction 4⁄5 in the first row. Wherefore
drawing S T parallel to the axis, the base will be divided in like
manner.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account