The English works of Thomas Hobbes of Malmesbury, Volume 01 (of 11)Hobbes, Thomas
Philosophy
The English works of Thomas Hobbes of Malmesbury, Volume 01 (of 11)
Hobbes, Thomas
Philosophy, English -- 17th century
23. Now that accident for which we give a certain name to any body, or
the accident which denominates its subject, is commonly called the
ESSENCE thereof; as rationality is the essence of a man; whiteness, of
any white thing, and extension the essence of a body. And the same
essence, in as much as it is generated, is called the FORM. Again, a
body, in respect of any accident, is called the SUBJECT, and in respect
of the form it is called the MATTER.
Also, the production or perishing of any accident makes its subject be
said _to be changed_; only the production or perishing of form makes it
be said it is _generated_ or _destroyed_; but in all generation and
mutation, the name of _matter_ still remains. For a table made of wood
is not only wooden, but wood; and a statue of brass is brass as well as
brazen; though Aristotle, in his _Metaphysics_, says, that whatsoever is
made of any thing ought not to be called ἐκεινὸ, but ἐκέινινον; as that
which is made of wood, not ξύλον, but ξύλινον, that is, not wood, but
wooden.
[Sidenote: First matter, what.]
24. And as for that matter which is common to all things, and which
philosophers, following Aristotle, usually call _materia prima_, that
is, _first matter_, it is not any body distinct from all other bodies,
nor is it one of them. What then is it? A mere name; yet a name which is
not of vain use; for it signifies a conception of body without the
consideration of any form or other accident except only magnitude or
extension, and aptness to receive form and other accident. So that
whensoever we have use of the name _body in general_, if we use that of
_materia prima_, we do well. For as when a man not knowing which was
first, water or ice, would find out which of the two were the matter of
both, he would be fain to suppose some third matter which were neither
of these two; so he that would find out what is the matter of all
things, ought to suppose such as is not the matter of anything that
exists. Wherefore _materia prima_ is nothing; and therefore they do not
attribute to it either form or any other accident besides quantity;
whereas all singular things have their forms and accidents certain.
_Materia prima_, therefore, is body in general, that is, body considered
universally, not as having neither form nor any accident, but in which
no form nor any other accident but quantity are at all considered, that
is, they are not drawn into argumentation.
[Sidenote: That the whole is greater than any part thereof, why
demonstrated.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account