The Essays of Douglas JerroldJerrold, Douglas William
General
The Essays of Douglas Jerrold
Jerrold, Douglas William
English essays -- 19th century
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[Illustration]
THE DRILL SERGEANT
SHALL we view our subject through the glasses of philosophy? Precious
microscopic glasses, by which we look into the exquisite order of a
bee’s weapon, which shames the ruggedness of that vaunted wonder of
man’s hands—a Whitechapel needle. By which the superfine coat of the
unworthy appears but as a vile complication of coarse hemp-strings; by
which we look into the heart that to the naked eye displays a tenanted
cherub, with voice of music and wings of light, but find a weak-eyed
little monster, with squeak of mouse and pinions of leather. O, glorious
spectacles! which show palaces not entirely as resting-places for
divinities—many laurels as nettles, stinging what they are fancied to
adorn—Fame’s trumpet, a penny whistle blown by Asthma—the awful person
of Ceremony, a Merry-Andrew stricken grave—a grand review-day, a game at
ninepins on an extensive scale—a levee, a triumph of the laceman and
jeweller—a court ode, a verbose receipt for wages—“honourable
gentleman,” convicted scoundrel—“learned friend,” stupid opponent—a
prison, a temporary retirement from noise—a glass of spring water, a
“cup of sack”—an ugly face, God’s own handiwork—a handsome one, nothing
more—noble blood, of the same hue as a carter’s—a black parish coffin, a
couch of crystal—a grave, a place of rest—consecrated earth, the whole
globe—a tombstone, work for the mason—a pompous epitaph, the toil of a
liar! This transformation—or rather, this showing of reality—is the
result of using the glasses of philosophy. Without the common microscope
we could not know how certain insects respired, whether at the mouth or
shoulders; wanting philosophy’s optic, we should be in like ignorance of
the source of being in some men—for all exist not by the same laws. To
the naked eye, indeed, there appears no difference; but to the
spectacled orb of philosophy it is shown that many men respire, not by
inward organisation, but by external and adventitious instruments. Let
those who are sceptical on this position consider for a moment the
bearing of a thorough-paced coxcomb: does he breathe from his lungs? No;
but from his habiliments. His coat, cravat, boots—yea, his spurs, are
the sources of his being, his dignity, his action. Nay, some men take
all their life from a riband at their button-hole, or a garter at their
leg.—Our Drill Sergeant takes it from his rattan.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account