The Ethics of Diet: A Catena of Authorities Deprecatory of the Practice of Flesh EatingWilliams, Howard
Philosophy
The Ethics of Diet: A Catena of Authorities Deprecatory of the Practice of Flesh Eating
Williams, Howard
Diet; Vegetarianism
Consistently with the expression of this true philosophy, he declares
elsewhere that--
“Nothing can be more shocking and horrid than one of our kitchens
sprinkled with blood, and abounding with the cries of expiring
victims, or with the limbs of dead animals scattered or hung up
here and there. It gives one the image of a giant’s den in romance,
bestrewed with scattered heads and mangled limbs.”[147]
The personal character of Pope, we may add, has of late been subjected
to minute and searching criticism. Some meannesses, springing from an
extreme anxiety for fame with after ages, have undoubtedly tarnished
his reputation for candour. His excessive animosity towards his public
or private enemies may be palliated in part, if not excused, by his
well-known feebleness of health and consequent mental irritability.
For the rest, he was capable of the most sincere and disinterested
attachments; and not his least merit, in literature, is that in an age
of servile authorship he cultivated literature not for place or pay,
but for its own sake.
* * * * *
Amongst Pope’s intimate friends were Dr. Arbuthnot, Dean Swift,
and Gay. The first of these, best known as the joint author with
Pope and Swift of _Martinus Scriblerus_, a satire on the useless
pedantry prevalent in education and letters, and especially as the
author of the _History of John Bull_ (the original of that immortal
personification of beef, beer, and prejudice), published his _Essay
Concerning Aliments_, in which the vegetable diet is commended as a
preventive or cure of certain diseases, about the year 1730. Not the
least meritorious of his works was an epitaph on the notorious Colonel
Chartres--one of the few epitaphs which are attentive less to custom
than to truth, and, we may add, in marked contrast with that typical
one on his unhistorical contemporary Captain Blifil.
In the _Travels of Lemuel Gulliver_ the reader will find the _sæva
indignatio_ of Swift--or, at all events, of the Houyhnhnms--amongst
other things, launched against the indiscriminating diet of his
countrymen:--
“I told him” [the Master-Horse], says Gulliver, “we fed on a
thousand things which operated contrary to each other--that we
eat when we are not hungry, and drink without the provocation of
thirst ... that it would be endless to give him a catalogue of all
diseases incident to human bodies, for they could not be fewer than
five or six hundred, spread over every limb and joint--in short,
every part, external and intestine, having diseases appropriated to
itself--to remedy which there was a sort of people bred up among us
in the profession or pretence of curing the sick.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account