The Ethics of Diet: A Catena of Authorities Deprecatory of the Practice of Flesh EatingWilliams, Howard
Philosophy
The Ethics of Diet: A Catena of Authorities Deprecatory of the Practice of Flesh Eating
Williams, Howard
Diet; Vegetarianism
“Some have supposed the cradle of our race to be Hindustan,
alleging that the feeblest of all animals must have been born in
the softest climate, and in a land which produces without culture
the _most nourishing and most healthful fruits_, like dates and
cocoa nuts. The latter especially easily affords men the means
of existence, of clothing and of housing themselves--and of what
besides has the inhabitant of that Peninsula need?... Our Houses of
Carnage, which they call Butcher-Shops [_boucheries_], where they
sell so many carcases to feed our own, would import the plague into
the climate of India.
“These peoples need and desire pure and refreshing foods. Nature
has lavished upon them forests of citron trees, orange trees, fig
trees, palm trees, cocoa-nut trees, and plains covered with rice.
The strongest man can need to spend but one or two sous a day for
his subsistence.[162] Our workmen spend more in one day than a
Malabar native in a month....
“In general, the men of the South-East have received from Nature
gentler manners than the people of our West. Their climate
disposes them to abstain from strong liquors and from the flesh
of animals--foods which excite the blood and often provoke
ferocity--and, although superstition and foreign irruptions have
corrupted the goodness of their disposition, nevertheless all
travellers agree that the character of these peoples has nothing of
that irritability, of that caprice, and of that harshness which it
has cost much trouble to keep within bounds in the countries of the
North.”
In noticing the comparative progress of the various foreign religions
in India, Voltaire observes that--
“The Mohammedan religion alone has made progress in India,
especially amongst the richer classes, because it is the religion
of the Prince, and because it teaches but the divine unity
conformably to the ancient teaching of the first Brahmins.
Christianity [he adds, only too truly] has not had the same
success, notwithstanding the large establishments of the
Portuguese, of the French, of the English, of the Dutch, of the
Danes. It is, in fact, the conflict of these nations which has
injured the progress of our Faith. As they all hate each other,
and as several of them often make war one upon the other in their
climates, what they teach is naturally hateful to the peaceful
inhabitants. Their customs, besides, revolt the Hindus. Those
people are scandalised at seeing us drinking wine and eating flesh,
which they themselves abhor.”[163]
This--one of the chief obstacles to the spread of Christian
civilisation in the East, and especially in India, viz., the eating of
flesh and the drinking of alcohol, its legitimate attendant--has been
acknowledged by Christian missionaries themselves of late years.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account