The Ethics of Diet: A Catena of Authorities Deprecatory of the Practice of Flesh EatingWilliams, Howard
Philosophy
The Ethics of Diet: A Catena of Authorities Deprecatory of the Practice of Flesh Eating
Williams, Howard
Diet; Vegetarianism
“It is thus that many Europeans, whom their destiny conducts to the
cannibal countries, after some months of sojourn with the natives,
make no difficulty of seating themselves at their banquet, and of
sharing their horrible repast, which at first had excited their
horror and disgust. They begin with devouring a dog: from the dog
to the man the space is soon cleared.
“Men believe themselves to be just, provided that they fulfil, in
regard to their fellows, the duties which have been prescribed to
them. But it is goodness which is the justice of man; and it is
impossible, I repeat it, to be good towards one’s fellow without
being so towards other existences. Let us not be the dupes of
_appearances_. Seneca, who lived only on the herbs of his garden,
to which he owed those last gleams of philosophy which enlightened,
so to speak, the fall of the Roman Empire, also thinks that crime
cannot be circumscribed: _Nullum intrà se manet vitium_. And if,
as Ovid affirms, the sword struck men only after having been first
dyed in the blood of the lower animals, what interest have we not
in respecting such a barrier? Like Æolus, who held in his hands the
bag in which the winds were confined, we may at our will, according
as we live upon plants or upon animals, tranquillize the earth or
excite terrible tempests upon it.
“I am too well aware that a subterfuge will be found in excusing
the crime by necessity, and calumniating Providence. According to
the pretended belief of the greatest number of people, if other
animals were not put to death, they would deprive men of the empire
of the earth. But it is easy to reply to this objection by the
examples of people who, holding in horror the effusion of blood,
and robbing no being of life--even the vilest or most hateful--are
by no means disturbed in the exercise of their sovereignty.[228]
And it would result from the examples of these people, if one had
not other proofs besides, that man is absolutely master of the
means of increasing or limiting the multiplication of the species
which are more or less in dependence upon him. And it is not less
evident that the earth, in this latter hypothesis, would support
an infinitely greater number of the human species. Thus will the
vegetable regimen be _necessarily_ adopted one day over the whole
earth, when the multiplication of our species shall have reached
a certain number fixed and pre-established by that imperious and
irrevocable law which is intimately connected, for the most part,
with humanity, justice, and virtue--the number at which it is
slowly arriving, arrested by the very causes which I am striving
to destroy, and which, for that single reason, ought to arm
against them all generous beings who appreciate the benefit of
existence.”[229]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account