The Ethics of Diet: A Catena of Authorities Deprecatory of the Practice of Flesh EatingWilliams, Howard
Philosophy
The Ethics of Diet: A Catena of Authorities Deprecatory of the Practice of Flesh Eating
Williams, Howard
Diet; Vegetarianism
“The monopolising eater of flesh would no longer destroy his
constitution by devouring an acre at a meal; and many loaves of
bread would cease to contribute to gout, madness, and apoplexy, in
the shape of a pint of porter or a dram of gin, when appeasing the
long-protracted famine of the hard-working peasant’s hungry babes.
The quantity of nutritious vegetable matter consumed in fattening
the carcase of an ox would afford ten times the sustenance,
undepraved, indeed, and incapable of generating disease, if
gathered immediately from the bosom of the earth. The most fertile
districts of the habitable globe are now actually cultivated by men
for [other] animals, at a delay and waste of aliment absolutely
incapable of calculation. It is only the wealthy that can, to any
great degree, even now, indulge the unnatural craving for dead
flesh, and they pay for the greater licence of the privilege by
subjection to supernumerary diseases. Again, the spirit of the
nation, that should take the lead in this great reform, would
insensibly become _agricultural_.
“The advantage of a reform in diet is obviously greater than that
of any other. It strikes at the _root_ of the evil. To remedy the
abuses of legislation, before we annihilate the propensities by
which they are produced, is to suppose that by taking away the
_effect_ the _cause_ will cease to operate....
“Let not too much, however, be expected from this system. The
healthiest among us is not exempt from hereditary disease. The most
symmetrical, athletic, and long-lived is a being inexpressibly
inferior to what he would have been, had not the unnatural habits
of his ancestors accumulated for him a certain portion of malady
and deformity. In the most perfect specimen of civilised man,
something is still found wanting by the physiological critic. Can a
return to Nature, then, instantaneously eradicate predispositions
that have been slowly taking root in the silence of innumerable
Ages? Undoubtedly not. All that I contend for is, that from the
moment of relinquishing all _unnatural_ habits no new disease is
generated; and that the predisposition to hereditary maladies
gradually perishes for want of its accustomed supply. In cases
of consumption, cancer, gout, asthma, and scrofula, such is the
invariable tendency of a diet of vegetables and pure water....”
He concludes this philosophic discourse with an earnest appeal to the
various classes of society:--
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account