The Ethics of Diet: A Catena of Authorities Deprecatory of the Practice of Flesh EatingWilliams, Howard
Philosophy
The Ethics of Diet: A Catena of Authorities Deprecatory of the Practice of Flesh Eating
Williams, Howard
Diet; Vegetarianism
“Be careful that the reading of many authors, and of every sort of
books, does not induce a certain vagueness and uncertainty of mind.
We ought to linger over and nourish our minds with, writers of
assured genius and worth, if we wish to extract something which may
usefully remain fixed in the mind. A multitude of books distracts
the mind. Read always, then, books of approved merit. If ever you
have a wish to go for a time to other kinds of books, yet always
return to the former.”[36]--(_Ep._ ii.)
In his 88th Letter Seneca well exposes the folly of a learning which
begins and ends in _mere words_, which has no real bearing on the
conduct of life and the instruction of the _moral_ faculties:--
“In testing the value of books and writers, let us see whether
or no they teach _virtue_.... You inquire minutely about the
wanderings of Ulysses rather than work for the prevention of error
in your own case. We have no leisure to hear exactly how and where
he was tossed about between Italy and Sicily.... The tempests of
the soul are ever tossing us, and evildoing urges us into all the
miseries of Ulysses.... Oh marvellously excellent education! By
it you can measure circles and squares, and all the distances of
the stars. There is nothing that is not within the reach of your
geometry. Since you are so able a mechanician, measure the human
mind. Tell me how great it is, how small it is (_pusillus_). You
know what a straight line is. What does it profit you, if you
know not what is straight (_rectum_) in life.”[37] What then? Are
liberal studies of no avail? For other things much; for virtue
nothing.... They do not lead the mind to virtue--they only clear
the way.
“Humanity forbids us to be arrogant towards our fellows; forbids us
to be grasping; shows itself kind and courteous to all, in word,
deed, and thought; thinks no evil of another, but rather loves its
own highest good, chiefly because it will be of good to another.
Do liberal studies [always] inculcate these maxims? No more than
they do simplicity of character and moderation; no more than they
do frugality and economy of living; no more than they do mercy,
which is as sparing of another’s blood as it is of its own, and
recognises that man is not to use the services of his fellows
unnecessarily or prodigally.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account