The Ethics of Diet: A Catena of Authorities Deprecatory of the Practice of Flesh EatingWilliams, Howard
Philosophy
The Ethics of Diet: A Catena of Authorities Deprecatory of the Practice of Flesh Eating
Williams, Howard
Diet; Vegetarianism
“Being thus wicked and incontinent in inordinate desires, it is no
less easy to be proved that men are more intemperate than other
animals even in those things which are necessary--_e.g._, in eating
and drinking--the pleasures of which we [the non-human races]
always enjoy with some benefit to ourselves. But you, pursuing
the pleasures of eating and drinking beyond the satisfaction of
nature, are punished with many and lingering diseases[44] which,
arising from the single fountain of superfluous gormandising,
fill your bodies with all manner of wind and vapours not easy for
purgation to expel. In the first place, all species of the lower
animals, according to their kind, feed upon one sort of food which
is proper to their natures--some upon grass, some upon roots,
and others upon fruits. Neither do they rob the weaker of their
nourishment. But man, such is his voracity, _falls upon all_ to
satisfy the pleasures of his appetite, tries all things, tastes all
things; and, as if he were yet to seek what was the most proper
diet and most agreeable to his nature, among all animals is the
only _all-devourer_.[45] He makes use of flesh _not out of want
and necessity_, seeing that he has the liberty to make his choice
of herbs and fruits, the plenty of which is inexhaustible; but
out of luxury and being cloyed with necessaries, he seeks after
impure and inconvenient diet, purchased by the slaughter of living
beings; by this showing himself more cruel than the most savage of
wild beasts. For blood, murder, and flesh are proper to nourish
the kite, the wolf, and the serpent: _to men they are superfluous
viands_. The lower animals abstain from most of other kinds and are
at enmity with only a few, and that only compelled by necessities
of hunger; but neither fish, nor fowl, nor anything that lives upon
the land escapes your tables, though they bear the name of humane
and _hospitable_.”
Reprobating the harshness and inhumanity of Cato the Censor, who is
usually regarded as the type of old Roman virtue, Plutarch, with his
accustomed good feeling, declares:--
“For my part, I cannot but charge his using his servants like
so many horses and oxen, or turning them off or selling them
when grown old, to the account of a mean and ungenerous spirit,
which thinks that the sole tie between man and man is interest or
necessity. But goodness moves in a larger sphere than [so-called]
justice. The obligations of law and equity reach only to mankind,
but kindness and beneficence should be extended to beings of every
species. And these always flow from the breast of a well-natured
man, as streams that flow from the living fountain.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account