The Ethics of Medical Homicide and MutilationO'Malley, Austin
Religion
The Ethics of Medical Homicide and Mutilation
O'Malley, Austin
Medical ethics
When the ordinary practitioner in small cities, towns, and country
places operates the mortality is very high. Newell[106] said that
in four cities of from 25,000 to 40,000 inhabitants within forty
miles of Boston he collected the following data: in A no patient on
whom cesarean section had been done is known to have recovered--a
mortality of 100 per cent. In B the mortality is from 60 to 70 per
cent. In C the operation is invariably fatal when done by the local
surgeons. In D the fatality is from 10 to 20 per cent. in average
cases, but since cesarean section has become popular as a method of
treatment for eclampsia the mortality is over 50 per cent.
[106] _Jour. Amer. Med. Assoc._, February 24, 1917.
In spite of perfect technic by the best obstetricians, the operation
has a high morbidity: fever, peritonitis, pneumonia, dilatation of
the stomach, and other bad results are common.
Before antiseptic surgery began, opening the abdominal cavity was
almost always fatal, and some obstetricians tried to get the child
out of the uterus in cases where cesarean delivery is indicated
by going in above the pelvis without opening the peritoneum. The
uterus was incised near its cervical end. This method, called
extraperitoneal cesarean delivery, has been restored for use in cases
where there is some infection of the uterus and the operator wishes
to save the child without removing the womb. The technic is more
difficult than in the classic cesarean, and the operation was not
kindly received, but of late some men are having so much success with
it that it is reviving, and rightly so. Baisch[107] says that the
first eleven women he delivered by extraperitoneal cesarean section
recovered more readily than they would from an ordinary laparotomy.
In nineteen cases of transperitoneal but cervical section he had
no trouble, and six of these were infected cases. The technic of
this low incision protects the peritoneal cavity better than the
classic incision, apparently. Two of the nineteen women were in
slight fever and the uterine fluids were fetid. Two primiparae forty
years of age had been in labor seventy hours. Eight of the women
were able to leave the clinic on the tenth day. Only one child was
lost, and that was a delayed case. Hofmeier[108] compiled 194 cases
of transperitoneal cervical cesarean section with three deaths.
Küstner did 110 extraperitoneal cesarean sections with no mortality.
This makes 304 cases of cesarean cervical section, not the classic
operation, with only three deaths, less than 1 per cent. mortality;
and fully 50 per cent. of these cases were not surgically clean. From
these statistics it is evident that the cervical operation in the
hands of competent surgeons should be the operation of choice.
[107] _Zentralblatt f. Gynäkologie._ Leipsic, October 30, 1915.
[108] _Münchener medizinische Wochenschrift_, January 4, 1916.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account