The Ethics of Medical Homicide and MutilationO'Malley, Austin
Religion
The Ethics of Medical Homicide and Mutilation
O'Malley, Austin
Medical ethics
The fact that in these cases of active or latent syphilis the disease
has been acquired criminally does not in itself affect the state of
the question one way or another--a criminal syphilitic has a right to
his reputation and goods despite his moral condition; but even where
the disease has been acquired without moral guilt the syphilitic is
always a formally or materially unjust aggressor in a prospective
marriage to an innocent and uninfected woman, and is to be treated
accordingly. If a woman may kill an unjust aggressor in defence
of her chastity, and if _quod liceat per se licet per alium_, her
natural protectors, kin, physician, and so on, may at least divulge
the secret of the man's condition in defence of her from a fate which
in many respects is worse than rape.
In keeping with this matter of entrusted secrets it is worth noting
that physicians should remember that the case histories they leave
after them at death, or which they leave unguarded in their offices,
are likely to be read by some third party who has no right to the
secrets they contain. Case histories which the patients would not
have divulged should be kept in cipher so far as proper names and
addresses are concerned.
CHAPTER XX
GONORRHEA IN MARRIAGE
Gonorrhea is caused by the gonococcus discovered by Neisser in 1879.
The name was given to the disease in the second century by Galen,
who supposed that the condition is a spermatorrhea. The infection
begins as a surface inflammation and gradually penetrates more or
less deeply into the underlying tissues. In the male, gonorrhea may
affect any part of the body; and when the disease is chronic it is a
source of infection for years. If a man who has had gonorrhea wishes
to marry after careful treatment, most physicians will permit him to
do so if he passes the customary tests which indicate cure, but he
is always dangerous. The tests are: (1) the microscopic and cultural
examinations of the centrifugalized morning urine--the washings
from the urethra must be negative after repeated trials and over a
space of months; (2) the microscopic and cultural examinations of
urethral spontaneous and artificial discharges must be negative in
the same manner; (3) the microscopic and cultural findings of the
secretion expressed from the prostate and seminal vesicles must be
negative in the same manner; (4) urethroscopic examinations of the
anterior and posterior urethra must show no unhealed lesions; (5) the
complement fixation test is to be repeatedly negative. The complement
fixation test is like a Wassermann reaction, but the antigen should
be polyvalent. This test does not give a positive reaction where no
gonorrhea is present, but it is often negative where the gonococcus
is present. Hence a positive result has value, but a negative result
has little or no value. All these tests are to be tried repeatedly,
and if negative for months, the physician may say the man is
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account