The Ethics of Medical Homicide and MutilationO'Malley, Austin
Religion
The Ethics of Medical Homicide and Mutilation
O'Malley, Austin
Medical ethics
The conservative surgery of the uterus and its adnexa in gonococcal
pelvic peritonitis was for many years looked upon with disfavor
by surgeons. These conservative operations often failed or later
required secondary intervention. Preliminary palliative treatment
as now used greatly lessened the number of failures. Operations
in peritonic conditions are dangerous because they may let loose
encysted bacteria and start up a general septic peritonitis, which
may be fatal. By delay and palliative treatment the virulence of
the bacteria subsides, except where the woman is reinfected by her
husband. In any case the blood-count should have been normal for
at least a month and a half before any surgical interference is
attempted. Olshausen waited nine months to let nature disinfect the
pus.
The removal of a part of a tube is called salpingotomy; the taking
out of the whole tube is salpingectomy; the opening up of a shut
tube is salpingostomy. The presence of pus in a tube is absolute
indication for removal according to the gynecologists at present.
Howard Kelly and others have succeeded at times in such cases with
conservative surgery, yet such treatment is now deemed obsolete--the
dangers and failures seem to overbalance the little good effected.
The end of conservative surgery is to try to restore function without
pain, to preserve menstruation and ovulation, to put the organs in a
condition to make pregnancy possible, and to preserve the internal
secretion of the ovaries. The ovaries, so far as the woman's health
is concerned, are the most important of her generative organs. If a
woman is at the end of her child-bearing age there is no reason to
preserve the tubes when they are affected, and conservation is likely
to fail; but the ovaries should always be preserved, wholly or in
part, when possible.
If one tube is infected from the uterus many gynecologists are
inclined to remove both tubes. When a single tube is affected the
cause is seldom the gonococcus, but some other bacteria which are
not persistent. When both tubes are affected the cause is commonly
the gonococcus, and attempts at preservation then fail, as a rule.
Norris, who is a reliable authority, holds that "the only cases
in which a salpingostomy is justifiable is on old, non-active
hydrosalpinges, and in those cases of tubal occlusion or phimosis
resulting from extratubal inflammation, such as sometimes result from
appendicitis or ectopic pregnancies."[179] When a tube is shut, if
it can be opened the opening tends to close again. A few cases of
subsequent pregnancy have occurred after salpingostomy, but such a
result is exceptional, because the origin is usually the gonococcus,
which destroys tissue and is very persistent.
[179] _Gonorrhea in Women_, p. 285. Philadelphia, 1913.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account