The Ethics of Medical Homicide and MutilationO'Malley, Austin
Religion
The Ethics of Medical Homicide and Mutilation
O'Malley, Austin
Medical ethics
When it is necessary to remove both ovaries and tubes an opinion very
common now is that it is better to take out the uterus also, because
in such cases the uterus and vagina atrophy and this condition later
causes trouble. Giles came upon such trouble in 11 per cent. of
sixty-two cases. As the uterus is useless after the removal of the
ovaries and tubes, there is no reason why it should not be removed.
The danger of atrophy is sufficient reason for the mutilation. In
operations for pelvic peritonitis it is well to remove also the
appendix, because it is nearly always diseased, or it will give
trouble from adhesions later and cause a secondary operation. It has
no function we know of at present.
In conservative surgery of the uterus and adnexa for pelvic
inflammatory diseases, the results attained by four skilled surgeons
are: Giles cured 90 per cent. of 132 cases; Polak cured 35 per
cent. of 300 cases; Robins cured 100 per cent. of 20 cases; Norris
cured 73 per cent. of 191 cases. Polak's patients became pregnant
after operation much oftener than those of the other operators.
Seventeen per cent. of his patients, from whom he removed one
ovary and resected the other, became pregnant. Giles found that of
his married patients under fifty years of age at the time of the
operation 25 per cent. became pregnant and went to term. They bore
twenty-five children. Five of these also miscarried. In sixty-eight
of Morris's cases seventeen were delivered of living children after
the operation; three had two children each, one had three children,
and there were seven miscarriages. In one of his cases where he
removed one ovary and _both_ tubes, the woman bore a healthy
full-term child two years after the operation. Dudley[193] found that
about 10 per cent. of 2168 cases of resection became pregnant after
operation. Ectopic gestation is likely to occur in a few cases after
conservative operations. Giles had seven such cases in his series of
132 operations, Polak one, and Norris two.
[193] _Jour. Amer. Med. Assoc._, vol. xli, n. 24.
When it is necessary to remove the uterus, the choice between
supravaginal hysterectomy, where the cervix is left in after the
destruction of its mucosa, and panhysterectomy, where the cervix and
the body of the uterus are removed, offers no moral problem except
the necessity of deciding upon what will be best for the woman.
Rupture of a pus tube is a very dangerous accident--all the patients
suffering from such a rupture die if not operated upon, and fifty per
cent. die even after operation. A physician may do this damage by
ignorant or careless examination, and he may be morally responsible
for the death. The accident happens not unfrequently from marital
congress, and if the husband has been warned by a physician but does
not heed this warning, he is guilty of murder if the woman dies after
rupture of the pus tube.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account