The Ethics of Medical Homicide and MutilationO'Malley, Austin
Religion
The Ethics of Medical Homicide and Mutilation
O'Malley, Austin
Medical ethics
Onanism, _coitus interruptus_, or withdrawal before ejaculation,
which takes place _extra vas_, is intended to prevent impregnation.
In the normal sexual act the male genital tract suddenly becomes
congested with blood through nervous action of centres in the
lumbar cord and the cerebrum. Cowper's and Littré's glands secret
an alkaline fluid which neutralizes the acid urine in the urethra
and thus prevents killing of the spermatozoa. Muscular peristaltic
action presses out the spermatozoa and the secretions of the seminal
vesicles and the prostate. When the act is normal there is a complete
emptying of the tract of semen and of the blood engorgement; in
_coitus interruptus_ there is incomplete ejaculation and only
partial deplethorization. The seminal vesicles remain distended,
and this distention, with the congestion of the prostate, causes
continual excitation of the sexual centres without relief. There is
irritability and exhaustion of the centres, and this state brings on
premature ejaculation and final _impotentia coeundi_. Other common
effects are tenesmus of the urinary bladder, incontinence of urine,
nocturnal pollutions, sexual neurasthenia, pain in the legs, over the
eyes, and in almost any part of the body, general weakness, headache,
vertigo, cardiac palpitation, neurotic dyspepsia, and a train of
psychic symptoms which not seldom end in suicide.
In the woman there is the like blood engorgement and a pouring
out of the secretions of Bartholin's and the other glands, but
deplethorization takes place later in the woman than in the man, and
for this reason the woman suffers more from _coitus interruptus_ than
the man does. In onanism, as in masturbation, after the diseased
conditions have been established it is extremely difficult to induce
the patient to resist the almost overwhelming irritation.
The canonists have interpreted the text of Sixtus V. to the effect
that the eunuch is impotent precisely and solely because he cannot
produce semen "_elaboratum in testibus_." No man produces semen
_elaboratum in testibus_--more than 93 per cent. of the semen is
produced entirely outside the testicle; nothing but the spermatozoa
and two or three drops of a lubricating fluid are produced in the
testicles. The eunuch really is impotent because the removal of the
testicles and their nervous system so breaks the genital circuit,
which consists of at least seventeen distinct parts, that erection is
prevented, the formation of spermatozoa is impossible, the secretion
of the essential vehicle of the sperm and of the fluids which render
it fertile is cut off. The eunuch cannot penetrate and he cannot form
any semen; he is impotent; the vasectomized man can penetrate, and he
forms a semen which is sterile.
I think now the vasectomized man is really impotent for the reason
that I think the _mulier excisa_ is impotent, but he is not impotent
because of the constitution of Sixtus V., which is not relevant at
all to his case.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account