The Ethics of Medical Homicide and MutilationO'Malley, Austin
Religion
The Ethics of Medical Homicide and Mutilation
O'Malley, Austin
Medical ethics
If the bleeding starts again every time the woman goes about her
duties, the abortion may be inevitable. When the cervix is shortened
and dilated so that the ovum is palpable and pieces of the decidua
or ovum are expelled, the hemorrhage is more or less profuse, and
especially if the bag of waters has ruptured and uterine contractions
show, the abortion is deemed inevitable. In such a case the fetus
may be alive, or it may be dead; and, again, conditions which
show all the classic symptoms of inevitable abortion sometimes,
though rarely, do not go on to abortion. It is extremely difficult,
and often impossible, to tell whether an early fetus is dead or
alive. A high, lasting fever sometimes kills the child; so do low
blood-pressure, profuse hemorrhages, deoxidation of the blood in
pneumonia, separation of the placenta, fatty degeneration of the
placenta, and the severe infections--in such cases there is always
strong probability that the child is dead when the abortion shows
its symptoms. If the fetal tissues that appear indicate maceration,
or if the discharge is fetid or purulent, the fetus is dead. Should
the fetus be alive, tamponing the vagina to check the hemorrhage
often separates the fetus from the uterus by the dissecting force of
the blood dammed back, or in any case tamponing is almost certain to
excite uterine contractions; thus there is an indirect killing of the
fetus.
The treatment of inevitable abortion after the fifth month differs
very much from the methods used in the early months. The prime
principle is, never interfere until forced to do so. When the
hemorrhage is dangerously profuse, so that the woman's life is
endangered (an exceptional condition), the uterine cervix and the
vagina must be tamponed with sterile gauze and cotton to check the
bleeding, but this is a last resort. If the fetus is alive, or
probably alive, nothing short of a necessity to save the woman's life
by this means justifies the use of the tampon. De Lee advises the
routine use of the tampon in threatened abortion, but this doctrine
is erroneous medically and altogether false morally. If the physician
knows the fetus is dead, he should, of course, tampon at once to get
rid of the fetus. The tampon excites uterine contractions and causes
destruction of a living fetus by dissecting it loose from the uterine
wall through the dammed blood. Elevation of the foot of the bed and
the use of morphine will, as a rule, check the bleeding.
When the woman is bleeding _to the risk of her life_, the tampon is
put in to check the bleeding and so save her life. The double effect
immediately following this indifferent act is on one side good,
the saving of her life; on the other side evil, the killing of the
fetus. The good effect is intended, the evil effect is reluctantly
permitted. Such a procedure is morally licit.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account