The Ethics of Medical Homicide and MutilationO'Malley, Austin
Religion
The Ethics of Medical Homicide and Mutilation
O'Malley, Austin
Medical ethics
To hasten even an inevitable death is homicide, and that quality
of merely hastening adds nothing for extenuation: every murder is
merely a hastening of inevitable death. To give a dying man a fatal
dose of morphine "to put him out of misery" is as criminal a murder
as to blow out his brains while he is walking the streets in health;
to ease pain is not commensurate with the horrible deordination of
taking a human life. This subversion of the moral law in the interest
of mawkish sentimentality is one of the gravest evils of modern
social ignorance. Physicians are constantly mistaking inclination, or
the mental vagaries of the nurses who influenced their childhood, for
rules of moral conduct. A physician is not a public executioner, nor
a judge with the power of life and death: his business is solely to
save human life, never to destroy it.
If there were anything in the objection that refusal to do abortion
opposes the life of a useless fetus to that of a useful mother of a
family, where would such false logic stop? If it held for the taking
of life in an unpleasant condition, it would hold _a fortiori_ in
every other less unpleasant condition where a life would not be at
stake. When a note that you had given falls due and it would bankrupt
you to pay it, does this inconvenience let you out of the difficulty
in honor, in the moral law, or in the civil law? It certainly does
not; but it should if the doctrine of the sentimentalists on
abortion were true. An eclamptic woman, or one with hyperemesis
gravidarum, conceived the child, got into the difficulty, and she and
her physician have no right to tear up the note they have given to
the Creator, especially when such tearing implies murder. Suppose,
again, a woman has done a deed for which she has in due process
of just law been condemned to death; suppose, also, there is only
one man available to put her to death, and if this man were killed
she could escape. Would her physician be permitted to shoot that
executioner to let her out of the difficulty? Certainly not. That,
however, is just what the physician does who empties an eclamptic
uterus of an unviable fetus. You may not do essential evil that
anything under the sun, good, bad, or indifferent, may come of it.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account