The Ethnology of the British Colonies and DependenciesLatham, R. G. (Robert Gordon)
History
The Ethnology of the British Colonies and Dependencies
Latham, R. G. (Robert Gordon)
Ethnology
The prominence of the nasal bones is certainly common amongst the Red
Indian tribes; and rare amongst the Eskimo. Yet it is neither universal
in the one, nor non-existent in the other. Oval features, a mixture of
red in the complexion, an aquiline nose, have all been observed amongst
the more favoured of the Circumpolar men and women.
In respect, too, to stature, the Eskimo is less remarkable for
inferiority than is generally supposed. His bulky, baggy dress makes him
look square and short. Measurements, however, correct this impression.
Men of the height of five feet ten inches have been noticed as
particular specimens--better grown individuals than their fellows. And
men under five feet have also been noticed for the contrary reasons.
Numerous measurements, however, give about five feet as the height of an
Eskimo woman, and five feet six inches as that of a man. This is more
than so good an authority as Mr. Crawfurd gives to the Malays; whose
person is squat, and whose average stature does not exceed five feet
three or four inches. It is more, too, than Sir R. Schomburgk gives the
Guiana Indians, as may be seen from the following table:--
+---------------+-------+-------------+
| | Aged. | ft. in. |
+---------------+-------+-------------+
| _Wapisianas._ | 12 | 4 8-5/10 |
| | 15 | 4 6 |
| | 16 | 5 1-1/10 |
+---------------+-------+-------------+
| _Tarumas._ | 14 | 4 11-3/10 |
+---------------+-------+-------------+
| _Mawackas._ | 15 | 4 10 |
| | 16} | 4 9-5/10 |
| | 17} | |
+---------------+-------+-------------+
| _Atorais._ | 35 | 5 1-5/10 |
| | 15 | 5 1 |
+---------------+-------+-------------+
| _Macusis._ | 14} | 4 8 |
| | 15} | |
| | 14 | 5 0 |
+---------------+-------+-------------+
It is more than the average of several other populations.
Neither is the Eskimo skull so wholly different from the American. It
is, probably, larger in its dimensions; so that its cavity contains more
cubic inches. The measurements, however, which suggest this view, are
but few. On the other hand, the relations between the _width_ and the
_depth_ of the skull, are considered important and distinctive.
By _width_ is meant the number of inches from side to side, from one
parietal bone to the other; in other words, the _parietal diameter_.
_Depth_ signifies the length of the _occipito-frontal_ diameter, or the
number of inches from the forehead to the back of the skull.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account