The Evacuation of England: The Twist in the Gulf StreamGratacap, L. P. (Louis Pope)
General
The Evacuation of England: The Twist in the Gulf Stream
Gratacap, L. P. (Louis Pope)
Climatic changes -- Fiction; Great Britain -- Fiction
These formerly elevated points were simply projections upon two
orogenic blocks of the earth’s crust, one extending from South America
to Porto Rico, the other the narrower coastal shelf forming the
isthmus. More plainly, these remarkable strips, curved in outline,
and with a varying length of four hundred to five hundred miles,
maintained a precarious stability with references to the adjoining
edges against which they abutted, and when a shock, violent enough to
rupture or release those edges, supervened they fell _out_ and _down_
like a brick or stone from an arch. When the more eastern of these
blocks, that on which the lesser Antilles stood, dropped, the oceanic
heated currents of the equatorial belt of the Atlantic rushed into the
Caribbean basin as usual, but with a perceptible acceleration. The
currents did not meet the frictional resistance of an archipelago of
small islands. Their progress westward continued, through the almost
simultaneously created outlet into the Pacific, by the submergence
of the isthmus. Upon the first report of President Roosevelt’s
apprehensions that this catastrophe would involve a disastrous
diversion of the Gulf Stream, European geographers had contemptuously
treated it as impossible, and stigmatized it as “an amusing futility
of envy.” They dwelt upon this fact, that the Gulf Stream did not
invade the bent arm of water forming the eastern water boundary of
the Isthmus of Panama, but shot across this somewhat withdrawn angle,
passing with undiminished volume in a straight path beyond Honduras,
into the capacious pocket of the Gulf of Mexico. “Let it be conceded,”
began an authoritative refutation in the _London Times_, “that the
structural impediment to the mixture of the waters of the Atlantic
and Pacific existing in the Isthmus of Panama is removed. Does
mixture follow? By no means, that is in no way subversive of present
hydrographic conditions. There will be a marginal intermixture, of
course, where there is actual contact, but it is presumptuous and
opposed to experience to say that two enormous bodies of water will
promiscuously exchange their contents through an opening, relatively
to their volume and extent, what a pinhole would be to the juxtaposed
masses of two great reservoirs. Further, this _disinclination_, as a
physical impossibility, of the waters of the two contiguous bodies of
practically equal density to diffuse into each other, is increased
by the strength and velocity of the Gulf Stream itself, which rushes
past the isthmus deflection, and instead of being turned aside into
that narrow aperture, would exert a suctorial influence upon the tides
of the Pacific, actually (though this is in no way insisted upon)
reinforcing its own volume and momentum by their contributions.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account