The Evening Post: A Century of JournalismNevins, Allan
History
The Evening Post: A Century of Journalism
Nevins, Allan
New York post
When the first rumblings of nullification were heard from South
Carolina in 1829, the _Evening Post_ refused to follow those newspapers
which treated the subject flippantly. “Every man of common sense must
know that if but a single stave is withdrawn from the barrel, it
inevitably tumbles to pieces,” Bryant warned his readers; “and that
whatever be the dimensions of the stave withdrawn, the catastrophe
is equally sure and fatal.” It was impossible for the journal not
to sympathize with the hot-tempered South Carolinians who wanted to
destroy the application of the tariff of 1828 to their State. It
thought that Col. Hayne was no more wrong about the Constitution
than the turncoat Webster was wrong about the tariff; but it warned
Calhoun’s and Hayne’s followers that their project was “insane”:
It is the destiny of all republics to be agitated occasionally by
the desperate plans of disappointed and ambitious men, resolved to
rule or ruin. Such might succeed with a corrupt people, but not
in our intelligent and free land. Public opinion has indignantly
rejected every proposition to dismember our confederacy, and has
pronounced a just judgment on those who prefer themselves to their
country--we have already among us more than one blasted monument of
selfish ambition. The wreck of our republic is not yet at hand--the
people’s devotion to the Union is invincible, and the same verdict
awaits every man, whether of the North, the South, the East, or the
West, who would dare to violate its integrity. (Aug. 29, 1832.)
Whether applauding Jackson as he sternly recalled South Carolina to
its senses, or attacking the protectionist doctrines, Bryant tried to
open his editorials with a flash of humor or an apposite story. When
the _American_ delayed a twelvemonth in apologizing for an insult to
Jackson, he told the anecdote of the worthy widow whose husband had
been dead for seven years and who declared that she could stand it no
longer. The opponent who sighed for the time when the Administration
would go into a state of “retiracy” reminded him of the Irishman who
had rushed for a map when he learned that Napoleon had taken Umbrage.
An exchange with a discourteous antagonist recalled the member of
the House of Commons who, having said that a colleague was not fit
to carry guts to a bear, and being required to apologize, stated: “I
retract--you _are_ fit to carry guts to a bear.” During 1831 many
Americans were boasting of having known Louis Philippe when he was an
expatriate in this country; and in rebuke to their snobbery, the editor
spoke of the man who was proud of having been noticed by a king--the
king had said, “Get out of my way, you scoundrel!” Bryant wrote
laboriously, not fluently, and made so many corrections that his copy
was often almost illegible; but he wrote with polish.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account