The Evening Post: A Century of JournalismNevins, Allan
History
The Evening Post: A Century of Journalism
Nevins, Allan
New York post
While I was shaving this morning at eight o’clock, I witnessed
from the front window an encounter in the street nearly opposite,
between William C. Bryant and William L. Stone; the former one
of the editors of the _Evening Post_, and the latter editor of
the _Commercial Advertiser_. The former commenced the attack by
striking Stone over the head with a cowskin; after a few blows the
men closed, and the whip was wrested from Bryant and carried off by
Stone. When I saw them first, two younger persons were engaged, but
soon discontinued their fight.
The next day Bryant made a public statement of this incident, pointing
out the gross provocation that he had received, but apologizing to his
readers for having taken the law into his own hands. Particularly as
there developed some doubt whether Col. Stone was the author of the
attack, he could never hear the matter referred to without showing his
chagrin and regret.
But Bryant had no sooner left the office for Europe than it became
plain that Leggett had no such scruples. In one brief paragraph he
managed to call the editor of the _Star_ a wretch, liar, coward, and
a vile purchased tool who would do anything for money. The “venomous
drivel” of the _Commercial Advertiser_ might sometimes require notice,
he wrote a few days later, but his contempt for the editor was “so
supreme that to us, personally, he is as if he were not--a perfect
non-entity.” In the autumn Assembly campaign Leggett shotted his
guns, and on Sept. 23 and 24 let off broadsides that shook the town.
He accused the _Daily Advertiser_ of “a vile untruth”; he called the
editor of the _American_ a “detestable caitiff,” a “craven wretch,
spotted with all kinds of vices,” and “a hireling slave and public
incendiary”; while he characterized the _Courier and Enquirer_ as a
blustering, bullying sheet, reeking with falsehood, pandering to the
vulgar, profligate, impudent, inane, and inciting men to riot and
bloodshed. On Sept. 26 Leggett was able to fill a column with answers.
“The editor is deranged,” said the _American_; he should be “committed
to Bedlam,” averred the _Gazette_; “a writ _de lunatico_” is needed,
chimed in the _Courier_; this, said the _Star_, “is too true to make a
jest of”; and the Boston _Atlas_ professed horror at “the ferocious,
mad, and bloody words of this desperate print.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account