The Evening Post: A Century of JournalismNevins, Allan
History
The Evening Post: A Century of Journalism
Nevins, Allan
New York post
He was dressed in black, and wore powder in his hair. He was a man
of a large and muscular frame of body, and about five feet nine
inches in height. He was upwards of seventy-six years of age. He
was in good health, and has never been known to have been affected
by any mental aberration. Any intelligence concerning him will be
most gratefully acknowledged by his afflicted friends and family,
if left for them, at the bar of the City Hotel.
No effort whatever was made to push an inquiry into this mystery, which
a generation later would have made the press ring for weeks.
III
Bryant resumed his editorial chair in the Pine Street office on Feb.
16, 1836, and set heroically to work to restore the _Evening Post_.
The net profits that year fell to $5,671.15, and in the panic year
following to $3,242.76. Leggett was only slowly convalescing at his
New Rochelle home, and the editor was assisted by Mason till the end
of May, when he obtained the services of Henry J. Anderson, professor
of mathematics at Columbia. He took a large furnished room on Fourth
Street, and was accustomed to be in his office at seven o’clock in
the morning. There was no money to hire many helpers, and until 1840
three men did practically all the writing. Bryant wrote the editorials
and literary notices; his chief assistant, first Anderson and then
Parke Godwin, clipped exchanges, furnished dramatic criticism, and
contributed short editorial paragraphs; and another man acted as
general reporter. Ship news was gathered by pilots in the common employ
of the evening papers.
Yet in this moment of adversity occurred one of those displays of
liberalism and enlightened judgment which are the special glory of the
_Evening Post_. After Leggett’s illness, Theodore Sedgwick, Jr., had
written an editorial (Nov. 14, 1835) arguing against the attitude of
condemnation which nearly all employers then took toward labor unions,
which were just beginning to find imperfect shape. He affirmed that
the whole body social was interested in promoting the objects of these
unions--in diminishing the hours of labor and increasing the wages of
the mechanics. The laboring masses, under the principle of universal
suffrage, held the government in their hands, and would exercise their
power wisely only if they had education and prosperity. This was
not the case: “compelled to labor the extremest amount that nature
can endure, and receiving for that excessive labor a compensation
which makes year after year of excessive toil necessary to obtain
independence, what leisure have they to devote to the acquisition of
... knowledge ...?” Bryant felt precisely as Leggett and Sedgwick
did on this subject. At the end of May, 1836, twenty-one journeymen
tailors who had formed a union were indicted for a conspiracy injurious
to trade and commerce, and after a three days’ trial in the court of
Oyer and Terminer, Judge Edwards charged the jury to find them guilty.
Bryant immediately (May 31) attacked him:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account