The Evening Post: A Century of JournalismNevins, Allan
History
The Evening Post: A Century of Journalism
Nevins, Allan
New York post
When in August of this year a meeting in Cincinnati resolved to silence
J. G. Birney’s abolitionist press by violence, the _Evening Post_ used
similar words. No tyranny in any part of the world was more absolute
or frightful than such mob tyranny. “So far as we are concerned, we
are resolved that this despotism shall neither be submitted to nor
encouraged.... We are resolved that the subject of slavery shall be,
as it ever has been, as free a subject for discussion, and argument,
and declamation, as the difference between whiggism and democracy, or
the difference between Arminians and Calvinists.” This was at a time
when the right of Abolitionists to continue their agitation was denied
from some of the most influential New York pulpits, when the great
majority of citizens had no tolerance for them, and when newspapers
like Bennett’s _Herald_ and Hallock’s _Journal of Commerce_, both
pro-slavery, gave them nothing but contempt and denunciation. When
Elijah P. Lovejoy was murdered at Alton, Ill., by a mob, there were
influential New Yorkers who believed that he had received his deserts,
but Bryant cried out in horror. Without free tongues and free pens,
the nation would fall into despotism or anarchy. “We approve, then,
we applaud--we would consecrate, if we could, to universal honor--the
conduct of those who bled in this gallant defense of the freedom of the
press. Whether they erred or not in their opinions, they did not err
in the conviction of their right, as citizens of a democratic State,
to express them; nor did they err in defending their rights with an
obstinacy which yielded only to death.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account