The Evening Post: A Century of JournalismNevins, Allan
History
The Evening Post: A Century of Journalism
Nevins, Allan
New York post
By the autumn of 1851 three main parties had taken shape upon the
question. A large and influential body of business men wanted no park
whatever; a considerable group of citizens would be satisfied with
Jones’s Wood alone; and a growing number wished a great central park.
The _Evening Post_ was for taking both sites. “There is now ample
room and verge enough upon the island for two parks,” wrote Bryant,
“whereas, if the matter is delayed for a few years, there will hardly
be a space left for one.” Having again and again expressed its hopes
with regard to Jones’s Woods, it now published glowing descriptions of
the Central Park area. There was no part of the island, it said, better
adapted to the purpose. “The elevation in some parts rising to the
height of one hundred and forty feet above tidewater, and the valleys
in other parts being some forty feet below the grading of the streets,
a richly diversified surface is presented, to which a great variety of
ornamental and picturesque effects may easily be given.” The valleys
abounded in springs and streams, which could quickly be converted into
artificial lakes, while the Croton aqueduct could supply water for
fountains.
By the efforts of leading citizens, City Hall, and the friendly
part of the press, the Legislature in the summer of 1853 was induced
to sanction the creation of both parks, passing two separate bills.
This filled those who opposed any park at all with rage. Admit the
possibility of two huge pleasure grounds, aggregating perhaps more
than a thousand acres? “What is it, in effect,” demanded the _Journal
of Commerce_, “but a law or laws to drive our population more and more
over to Brooklyn, Williamsburgh, Staten Island, Jersey City, etc., by
creating a barrier half a mile to two miles wide, north and south,
and occupying half the island east and west, over which population
cannot conveniently pass? If ever these projects should be carried into
effect, they will cost our citizens millions of dollars.... Small parks
would be a public blessing; and might be as numerous as the health
and comfort of our citizens would require, but a perpetual edict of
desolation against two and one half square miles of this small island,
might better come from the bitterest enemies of our city than from its
friends.” On the contrary, replied the _Evening Post_, the park would
dissuade residents of Manhattan, made desperate by the congestion,
dirt, and noise of the streets, from removing to greener and more
spacious districts like Brooklyn and New Brighton. Even after the parks
were created, the island would offer room for four or five million
people. The same sort of skeptics had assailed the Croton project.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account