The Evening Post: A Century of JournalismNevins, Allan
History
The Evening Post: A Century of Journalism
Nevins, Allan
New York post
The newspaper most conspicuously in a position to pronounce upon new
volumes was the _Evening Post_, for the literary judgment of Bryant
and Parke Godwin was excellent. But Bryant had no ambition to be
known as a critic. Apart from his shrewd but not deeply penetrative
discourses upon Irving, Cooper, Verplanck, and Halleck, he wrote
only a half-dozen extensive literary essays, the best known being
his really fine “Poets and Poetry of the English Language,” with its
insistence upon a “luminous style.” Moreover, so straitened were the
paper’s circumstances and so small in consequence was its staff, that
he and Godwin had no time for reading and reviewing. “I see the
outside of almost every book that is published, but I read little
that is new,” runs a letter of Bryant’s to Dana in 1837. Frank avowal
was frequently made that a formal review was not within the _Evening
Post’s_ powers. The notice of Cooper’s “Wyandotte” (1843) opened with
the remark that “we have not had time to read it, but we are informed
by the preface....” Five years later Bryant wrote of J. T. Headley’s
“Cromwell”: “We have not time in the midst of the continual hurry in
which those are involved who write for a daily newspaper, to examine
the work with any minuteness; this will be done doubtless by professed
critics.”
Slight as were the _Post’s_ comments upon most books, a particular
interest attaches to those upon current volumes of poetry, for Bryant
wrote them; his associate, John Bigelow, has expressed surprise that
Parke Godwin, in his biography, did not collect them. In the “Fable
for Critics,” Lowell speaks of Bryant’s “iceolation,” and biographers
of both Longfellow and Poe have accused him of indifference to these
younger poets. There is much evidence, however, as in Bryant’s admiring
letter to Longfellow in 1846, that the charge is unfair; and a study of
the _Evening Post_ files indicates that its editor carefully followed
the work of his juniors in poetry, was glad to bring it to public
notice, and was a good deal more prone to over-praise than to underrate
it. Bryant was the dean among American poets, the first to gain fame,
and regarded by Griswold, Walt Whitman, and many others as the best of
them; as the Bryant Festival in 1864 showed, in which Holmes, Lowell,
Emerson, and Whittier participated, they all looked up to him.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account