The Evening Post: A Century of JournalismNevins, Allan
History
The Evening Post: A Century of Journalism
Nevins, Allan
New York post
Wadsworth reiterated this opinion all spring, while Bryant heard from
Gen. John Pope and Gen. Hitchcock in the same vein. It was not until
May 5 that McClellan fought his first battle, though he had held
command since the preceding July. The _Evening Post_ was full of hope
in the Peninsular campaign that followed, warning McClellan not to
overestimate the enemy’s forces, and that “hitherto our great fault has
been that we have not followed up our successes.” Its dejection was
proportionately great when in the first days of July the campaign ended
in failure, and McClellan withdrew his army from the position he had
reached immediately in front of Richmond. The disgust of the radicals
with McClellan was now complete, and the _Post_ was as eloquent as the
_Tribune_ or _Times_ in attacking him. On July 3 it mournfully remarked
that “while the cause cannot perhaps be defeated even by incompetence,”
it could be gravely imperilled. “We have suffered long enough from
inaction and overcaution. Henceforth we must have action.... If it be
asked who is the best man, we can only say that it is Mr. Lincoln’s
business to know, but bitter experience has taught us that Gen.
McClellan is not.” Lincoln was admonished that he must open his eyes
without a moment’s delay to the exigency, dismiss every slothful or
imbecile leader, infuse energy and unity into his Cabinet, and recruit
new armies. It was now that the _Post_ began asking for conscription,
while it gave a ringing endorsement to Lincoln’s call for “three
hundred thousand more.”
The _Herald_, incapable of blaming a Democrat like McClellan, in July
attacked Stanton for the army’s failure, but the _Evening Post_ showed
that McClellan himself had said that he had more than enough troops to
take Richmond. The Chicago _Tribune_ later accused it of injustice to
Lincoln in saying that McClellan should have been dismissed earlier,
since Lincoln could not do so without offending loyal Democrats. That,
rejoined the _Post_, is precisely the ground for our objection to
McClellan; he was retained for political, not military, reasons.
These July days were the days in which Lincoln grew thin and haggard,
Seward was sent upon a circuit of the North to arouse public men in
support of the new enlistment programme, and Lowell wrote, “I don’t see
how we are to be saved but by a miracle.” Who should succeed McClellan?
Chase and Welles believed that the best general in view for the eastern
command was John Pope, whose victory at Island No. 10 had given him
national fame; and Bryant and Godwin, who had had some personal contact
with Pope, agreed. He was called east and given the Army of Virginia.
The chief command, however, went to Halleck, whom the _Evening Post_
distrusted as much as Welles did, and had already (July 23) described
as slower and less enterprising than McClellan.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account