The Everett Massacre: A history of the class struggle in the lumber industrySmith, Walker C.
History
The Everett Massacre: A history of the class struggle in the lumber industry
Smith, Walker C.
Industrial Workers of the World; Lumbering -- Washington (State); Lumbermen -- Washington (State)
Auspos stated that he was willing to take a chance in the fight for free
speech and that the worst he expected was something similar to the
happenings at Beverly Park. That he was not so willing in his testimony
was shown by the uneasy actions of the prosecution lawyers, who moved
from place to place around the court room during the examination of
this witness, with the view of having him look one of them in the eyes
at all times during his recital. At one time Black nearly climbed into
the jury box, while Cooley fidgeted in his chair placed directly in the
middle of the aisle, and Veitch stood back of the court clerk on the
opposite side of the court room, trying to engage the attention of the
hesitating witness.
The testimony was to the effect that Auspos had reached Seattle on
Saturday, November 4th, and had slept in the I. W. W. hall that night.
Next morning at about eleven o'clock he returned from breakfast and was
again admitted with examination for a membership card. A meeting was in
progress in the gymnasium but was too crowded for him to be able to get
in. There was no secrecy, however, just as there was no oath of fealty
demanded of a worker upon joining the organization. The witness claimed
that he and one of the defendants, J. E. Houlihan, were standing
together in the hall when "Red" Doran called Houlihan aside into the
gymnasium. Two minutes later Houlihan returned and said, "I made it."
"What did you get?" Auspos declared he then asked his partner, receiving
the reply, "A thirty-eight." Auspos claimed he saw Earl Osborne cleaning
a gun in the gymnasium that same morning, and there was a rifle or
shotgun in a canvas case in one corner. He said that men were breaking
up chairs to obtain legs as clubs and that he, with others, was
furnished with a little package of red pepper.
Regarding his actions upon the Verona the witness stated that he and
James Hadley came up the steps from the freight deck to the passenger
deck just as the boat was nosing against the dock and that he walked
across the deck to a point within three feet of the rail. His
description of the motion of McRae's hands differed from that given by
the deputy witnesses and was such as would indicate the drawing of a gun
from a belt holster. He testified that McRae swung around to the right
just before being shot, thus contradicting McRae, who had declared that
the turn he had made was to the left. The witness in a rather indefinite
manner stated that the first shot came from the boat. All the damaging
claims in the testimony of Auspos were severely shaken by the
cross-examination conducted by Moore, and Auspos finally admitted that
the only point on which he wished to have his evidence differ from the
statement he had made to Vanderveer prior to the trial was in the matter
of the firing of the first shot. Auspos made no attempt to identify
anyone on the boat as having a firearm.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account