The Everett Massacre: A history of the class struggle in the lumber industrySmith, Walker C.
History
The Everett Massacre: A history of the class struggle in the lumber industry
Smith, Walker C.
Industrial Workers of the World; Lumbering -- Washington (State); Lumbermen -- Washington (State)
Taken as a whole the instructions were distinctly unfavorable to the
defendant, not because of any particular bias of the judge whose
political ambitions might have made him desirous of establishing a
record for fairness, but by reason of the fact that the law itself on
the question of criminal conspiracy is archaic and absurd, being based
upon precedents established when the use of electricity and steam power
were unknown, when the stage coach was the fastest means of locomotion
and the tallow dip the principal form of illumination. This law, like
all other statute law, was created thru the desire of the ruling class
to protect property, therefore it contained no element of justice when
applied to the modern proletariat, the twentieth century worker stripped
of everything but his power to labor.
Following the reading of the court's instructions prosecutor Black made
his argument, Vanderveer and Moore for the defense addressing the jury
in turn, and Cooley making the concluding plea for the state. This
arrangement gave Veitch no chance to turn loose his oratorical
fireworks, much to the chagrin of the gentleman who had been so kindly
loaned to the prosecution by the Merchants' and Manufacturers'
Association.
Black's lengthy address was a whine for pity because of his youth and a
prayer for relief from the dire straits and legal bankruptcy into which
Snohomish County had fallen. It is summarized in the following:
"We are at the close of a great trial. A great deal of evidence has been
introduced; practically two million five hundred words. From the
standpoint of the attorneys who have tried this case the evidence has
been very complicated because it had in it a great mass of evidence that
was only remotely connected with the real issue at bar. You as jurors
have a very simple question to decide in this case.
"Thomas H. Tracy is charged with the crime of murder in the first
degree, not that he himself killed Jefferson Beard, but that he, Thomas
H. Tracy, aided, incited and encouraged some unknown one to kill
Jefferson Beard of Everett, on last November 5th.
"I repeat first that some person on the boat unlawfully killed Jefferson
Beard; secondly that this defendant, aided, incited and encouraged such
shooting.
"I come before you as the prosecuting attorney of Snohomish County.
Owing to the exigencies of politics I was elected to office a few days
after November 5th, the time of this catastrophe. Two months and a few
days after, I took office and found a man charged with a crime that I
did not have the power of prosecution over up to that time. Mr. Webb,
then prosecuting attorney, who had started the action and initiated and
seen fit to collect some of the evidence, was not able to complete the
prosecution on account of the size of the trial.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account