The Evidence in the Case: A Discussion of the Moral Responsibility for the War of 1914, as Disclosed by the Diplomatic Records of England, Germany, RussiaBeck, James M. (James Montgomery)
Philosophy
The Evidence in the Case: A Discussion of the Moral Responsibility for the War of 1914, as Disclosed by the Diplomatic Records of England, Germany, Russia
Beck, James M. (James Montgomery)
World War, 1914-1918 -- Causes
Even under these conditions Belgium evidently entertained a hope that
Germany at the last moment would not, in view of its promises and the
protest of Belgium, commit this foul outrage.
The military attaché of the French Government, being apprised of
Germany's virtual declaration of war, offered "the support of five
French army corps to the Belgian Government," and in reply Belgium,
still jealously regardful of her obligation of neutrality, replied:
We are sincerely grateful to the French Government for
offering eventual support. In the actual circumstances,
however, we do not propose to appeal to the guarantee of the
Powers. The Belgian Government will decide later on the
action which they think it necessary to take.
As in Cæsar's time, the Belgæ, of all the tribes of Gaul, are in truth
"the bravest."
Later in the evening, the King of Belgium met his Ministers, and the
offer of France was communicated to them, and again the Belgian
Government, still reposing some confidence in the Punic faith of
Prussia, decided not to appeal to the guaranteeing Powers, or to
avail itself of the offers of France.
On the following morning at 6 o'clock the German Minister handed this
formal declaration of war to the Belgian Government:
I have been instructed, and have the honor to inform your
Excellency, that in consequence of the Government of His
Majesty the King having declined the well-intentioned
proposals submitted to them by the Imperial Government, the
latter will, deeply to their regret, be compelled to carry
out--if necessary by force of arms--the measures of security
which have been set forth as indispensable in view of the
French menaces.
Here again, no active violation of Belgium's neutrality by France is
alleged, only "French menaces."
The conjecture is plausible that in the case of the Prussian General
Staff, it was their "own hard dealings" which thus taught them to
"suspect the thoughts of others."
On that day the German troops crossed the Belgian frontier and
hostilities began.
On the same day, at the great session of the Reichstag, when the
Imperial Chancellor attempted to justify to the world the hostile acts
of Germany, and especially the invasion of Belgium, the pretended
defense was thus bluntly stated by the German Premier:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account