The Evidence in the Case: A Discussion of the Moral Responsibility for the War of 1914, as Disclosed by the Diplomatic Records of England, Germany, RussiaBeck, James M. (James Montgomery)
Philosophy
The Evidence in the Case: A Discussion of the Moral Responsibility for the War of 1914, as Disclosed by the Diplomatic Records of England, Germany, Russia
Beck, James M. (James Montgomery)
World War, 1914-1918 -- Causes
attitude of people toward Kaiser, 109 ff.;
knew that Servia would refuse demand of "judiciary coöperation", 115;
further proof of Germany's advance knowledge of Austria's ultimatum,
116;
petty finesse of, 123;
excuse of, for not getting extension of time, 124;
avoids foreign diplomats, 125;
diplomats reluctant to leave copies of notes, 127 ff.;
Ambassador to France denies agreement with Austria over note to
Servia, 129;
assures France that she is for peace, 130;
refuses France's request for peace conference, 133;
"closest interests" of, 136;
national selfishness, 136;
believes Russia will keep out, 140;
believes France "in no position for war," 140;
belief of, regarding war preparedness and action of other nations,
140, 141;
ultimatum to Russia, 141;
preparedness for war, 142;
assured of no provocative action on part of Russia, 152;
offer of, to England, 159 ff.;
advances upon France, 161;
French report of army movements, 161, 162;
evades England's request for peace suggestion, 169;
declaration of war by, quoted, 183, 184;
proof of preparedness of, 188, 189;
declares war on Russia, 192;
ultimatum of, to France, 192;
delays declaration of war upon France, 192;
awaits French act of aggression, 192;
Ambassador leaves Paris, 192;
ready for invasion of France, 193;
pacific intentions of, false, 193, 194;
inconsistency in policies of, 194;
diplomats and army not in harmony, 194;
disregard of, for rights of Belgium, 196;
respected neutrality of Belgium in 1870, 200;
professes intention of respecting Belgian neutrality, 201 ff.;
recognizes obligations of neutrality treaty, 202;
Foreign Office suppresses telegram of Czar, 189;
places responsibility for war upon Russia, 192;
evades England's question concerning Belgian neutrality, 208;
insists she is forced to invade Belgium, 210;
declares France will invade Belgium, 210;
excuses of, for invasion of Belgium, 210 ff.;
declares war upon Belgium, 215;
invades Belgium, 215;
invasion of Belgium considered and analyzed, 217 ff.;
imposes fines upon Belgium, 217 ff.;
reply of, to English ultimatum, 220;
declares necessity forces invasion of Belgium, 220;
defense of, for invasion of Belgium, 224;
moral isolation of, 229;
compared to Dr. Cook, 232;
plea of guilty, 233 ff.;
claims discovery of secret documents in Brussels, 235;
strategic railroads of, 237;
campaign which should have been followed, 245;
suppression of evidence by, useless, 246;
conclusions concerning actions of, 249 _et seq._;
attitude of people in, 256;
_see_ Kaiser, Lichnowsky, Prussia, Triple Alliance, von Below,
Bethmann-Hollweg, von Heeringen, von Jagow, von Schoen
Gladstone, did not rely on "neutrality of Belgium" treaty, 198;
speech of, concerning Belgium, quoted, 199;
speech of, cited by Shaw, 199
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account