The Evidence in the Case: A Discussion of the Moral Responsibility for the War of 1914, as Disclosed by the Diplomatic Records of England, Germany, RussiaBeck, James M. (James Montgomery)
Philosophy
The Evidence in the Case: A Discussion of the Moral Responsibility for the War of 1914, as Disclosed by the Diplomatic Records of England, Germany, Russia
Beck, James M. (James Montgomery)
World War, 1914-1918 -- Causes
This seemed to be the fatal error of Germany, that its duties to
civilization were so slight that it should support its ally, Austria,
whether the latter were right or wrong. Such was its policy, and it
carried it out with fatal consistency. To support its ally in actual
war without respect to the justice of the quarrel may be defensible,
but to support it in a time of peace in an iniquitous demand and a
policy of gross discourtesy to friendly States offends every sense of
international morality.
On the following day Russia proposed to Austria that they should enter
into an exchange of private views, with the object of an alteration in
common of some clauses of the Austrian ultimatum. _To this Austria
never even replied._
The Russian Minister communicated this suggestion to the German
Minister for Foreign Affairs and expressed the hope that he would
"find it possible to advise Vienna to meet our proposal," but this did
not accord with German policy, for on that day the German Ambassador
in Paris called upon the French Minister of Foreign Affairs, and
submitted the following formal declaration:
"Austria has declared to Russia that she does not seek
territorial acquisitions, and that she does not threaten the
integrity of Servia. Her only object is to insure her own
tranquillity. Consequently it rests with Russia to avoid
war. Germany feels herself at one with France in her keen
desire to preserve the peace, and strongly hopes that France
will use her influence at St. Petersburg in the direction of
moderation." _The [French] Minister observed that Germany
could on her side take similar steps at Vienna, especially
in view of the conciliatory spirit which Servia had shown.
The Ambassador answered that that was not possible, in
view of the resolution taken not to interfere in the
Austro-Servian conflict._ Thereupon the Minister asked if
the four Powers--England, Germany, Italy, and France--were
not able to take steps at St. Petersburg and Vienna, since
the affair reduced itself in essentials to a conflict
between Russia and Austria. The Ambassador pleaded the
absence of instructions. Finally, the Minister refused to
adhere to the German proposal.[29]
[Footnote 29: Russian _Orange Paper_, No. 28.]
This significant interview states the consistent attitude of Germany.
The burden is put upon France to induce its ally to desist from any
intervention and thus give Austria a free hand, while Germany
emphatically declines to promote the same pacific object by suggesting
to Austria a more conciliatory course.
On the same day England asked France, Italy, and Germany to meet in
London for an immediate conference to preserve the peace of Europe,
and to this fruitful suggestion, which might have saved that peace,
the German Secretary of State, after conferring with the British
Ambassador at Berlin, replied that the conference
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account