The Evidence in the Case: A Discussion of the Moral Responsibility for the War of 1914, as Disclosed by the Diplomatic Records of England, Germany, RussiaBeck, James M. (James Montgomery)
Philosophy
The Evidence in the Case: A Discussion of the Moral Responsibility for the War of 1914, as Disclosed by the Diplomatic Records of England, Germany, Russia
Beck, James M. (James Montgomery)
World War, 1914-1918 -- Causes
would practically amount to a court of arbitration and could
not, in his opinion, be called together except at the
request of Austria and Russia. He could not, therefore, fall
in with your [Sir Edward Grey's] suggestion, desirous though
he was to coöperate for the maintenance of peace. I [Sir E.
Goschen] said I was sure that your idea had nothing to do
with arbitration, but meant that representatives of the four
nations not directly interested should discuss and suggest
means for avoiding a dangerous situation. He [von Jagow]
maintained, however, that such a conference as you proposed
was not practicable.[30]
[Footnote 30: English _White Paper_, No. 43.]
Germany's refusal to have Servia's case submitted to the Powers even
for their consideration is the more striking when it is recalled that
on the same day the German Ambassador at London quoted the German
Secretary of State as saying
that there were some things in the Austrian note that Servia
could hardly be expected to accept,
thus recognizing that Austria's ultimatum was, at least in part,
unjust. Sir Edward Grey then called the German Ambassador's attention
to the fact that if Austria refused the conciliatory reply of Servia
and marched into that country
it meant that she was determined to crush Servia at all
costs, being reckless of the consequences that might be
involved.
He added that the Servian reply
should at least be treated as a basis for discussion and
pause,
and asked that the German Government should urge this at Vienna but,
as we have already seen, the German Secretary of State had already
replied that such a conference "was not practicable," and that it
"would practically amount to a court of arbitration," and could not,
in his opinion, be called together "except at the request of Austria
and Russia."[31]
[Footnote 31: English _White Paper_, No. 16.]
That this was a mere evasion is perfectly plain. Germany already knew
that Austria would not ask for such a conference, for Austria had
already refused Russia's request for an extension of time and had
actually commenced its military operations.
Germany's attitude is again clearly indicated by the letter of the
Russian Minister in Germany to the Russian Foreign Office in which he
states that on July 27th he called at the German Foreign Office and
asked it,
to urge upon Vienna in a more pressing fashion to take up
this line of conciliation. Von Jagow replied that he could
not advise Austria to yield.[32]
[Footnote 32: Russian _Orange Paper_, No. 38.]
Why not? Russia and its allies had advised Servia to yield and Servia
had conceded nearly every claim. Why could not the German Foreign
Office advise Vienna to meet conciliation by conciliation, if its
desire for peace were sincere?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account