The evolution of general ideasRibot, Th. (Théodule)
Science
The evolution of general ideas
Ribot, Th. (Théodule)
Abstraction; Imagination
Abstraction belongs to this last type, with intervention of the
process described by Cournot. Attention brings a feature into relief;
inattention, and voluntary inhibition, act as extinguishers to the other
characteristics.
Let us pass from theory to practice. This antagonism is of current
observation, almost a banality, whenever men of imagination are
confronted with abstract thinkers. We must of course exclude those who
by a rare gift of nature (Goethe), or by the artifice of education, are
capable of handling the image and concept alternately.
Let us take the artists as type of the imaginative thinker: the novelist,
poet, sculptor, painter, musician, etc. Each dreams of an organic,
living work, a _complex_. Some with words, others with forms, others
with sounds; realists with the aid of minute detail, classics by means
of general sketches; all make for the same end. Music again, which from
its nature seems a thing apart, is an architecture of sounds of amazing
complexity, often exciting contradictory states of mind.
Among abstract thinkers (theorists, scientists) the tendency is always
towards unity, law, generalities—towards _simplification_: by what
is fundamental and essential, if the man be genuine; by shifting and
accidental features, if he is a charlatan. The mathematician and the pure
metaphysician have usually a distaste for facts, for multiplicity of
detail. A writer whose name has escaped me says: “Every scientist smells
of the cadaver.” This is our thesis, under the form of an image. Abstract
thought is a cadaver. It would be more just, though less picturesque,
to say a skeleton; for scientific abstraction is the bony framework of
phenomena.
The antagonism between the image and the idea is thus fundamentally
that of the whole and the part. It is impossible to be at the same
time an abstract thinker and an imaginative thinker, because one
cannot simultaneously think the whole and the part, the group and the
fraction; and these two habits of mind while not absolutely exclusive are
antagonistic.
* * * * *
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account