Anatomy, Comparative; Embryology, Human; Evolution; Human beings -- Origin
If we now glance at the entire structure of the simple Ascidia
(especially _Phallusia, Cynthia,_ etc.) and compare it with that of the
Amphioxus, we shall find that the two have few points of contact. It is
true that the fully-developed Ascidia resembles the Amphioxus in
several important features of its internal structure, and especially in
the peculiar character of the gill-crate and gut. But in most other
features of organisation it is so far removed from it, and is so unlike
it in external appearance, that the really close relationship of the
two was not discovered until their embryology was studied. We will now
compare the embryonic development of the two animals, and find to our
great astonishment that the same embryonic form develops from the ovum
of the Amphioxus as from that of the Ascidia—a typical _ chordula._
Chapter XVII.
EMBRYOLOGY OF THE LANCELET AND THE SEA-SQUIRT
The structural features that distinguish the vertebrates from the
invertebrates are so prominent that there was the greatest difficulty
in the earlier stages of classification in determining the affinity of
these two great groups. When scientists began to speak of the affinity
of the various animal groups in more than a figurative—in a
genealogical—sense, this question came at once to the front, and seemed
to constitute one of the chief obstacles to the carrying-out of the
evolutionary theory. Even earlier, when they had studied the relations
of the chief groups, without any idea of real genealogical connection,
they believed they had found here and there among the invertebrates
points of contact with the vertebrates: some of the worms, especially,
seemed to approach the vertebrates in structure, such as the marine
arrow-worm (_Sagitta_). But on closer study the analogies proved
untenable. When Darwin gave an impulse to the construction of a real
stem-history of the animal kingdom by his reform of the theory of
evolution, the solution of this problem was found to be particularly
difficult. When I made the first attempt in my _General Morphology_
(1866) to work out the theory and apply it to classification, I found
no problem of phylogeny that gave me so much trouble as the linking of
the vertebrates with the invertebrates.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account